Detection of circulating tumor DNA with ultradeep sequencing of plasma cell‐free DNA for monitoring minimal residual disease and early detection of recurrence in early‐stage lung cancer

Aaron C. Tan,Gillianne G. Y. Lai,Stephanie P. L. Saw,Kevin L. M. Chua,Angela Takano,Boon‐Hean Ong,Tina P. T. Koh,Amit Jain,Wan Ling Tan,Quan Sing Ng,Ravindran Kanesvaran,Tanujaa Rajasekaran,Ekaterina Kalashnikova,Derrick Renner,Sumedha Sudhaman,Meenakshi Malhotra,Himanshu Sethi,Minetta C. Liu,Alexey Aleshin,Wan‐Teck Lim,Eng‐Huat Tan,Anders J. Skanderup,Mei‐Kim Ang,Daniel S. W. Tan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35263
IF: 6.9209
2024-03-02
Cancer
Abstract:Background In early‐stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), recurrence is frequently observed. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a noninvasive tool to risk stratify patients for recurrence after curative intent therapy. This study aimed to risk stratify patients with early‐stage NSCLC via a personalized, tumor‐informed multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) next‐generation sequencing assay. Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients with stage I–III NSCLC. Recruited patients received standard‐of‐care management (surgical resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy, followed by surveillance). Whole‐exome sequencing of NSCLC resected tissue and matched germline DNA was used to design patient‐specific mPCR assays (Signatera, Natera, Inc) to track up to 16 single‐nucleotide variants in plasma samples. Results The overall cohort with analyzed plasma samples consisted of 57 patients. Stage distribution was 68% for stage I and 16% each for stages II and III. Presurgery (i.e., at baseline), ctDNA was detected in 15 of 57 patients (26%). ctDNA detection presurgery was significantly associated with shorter recurrence‐free survival (RFS; hazard ratio [HR], 3.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–12.62; p = .009). In the postsurgery setting, ctDNA was detected in seven patients, of whom 100% experienced radiological recurrence. ctDNA positivity preceded radiological findings by a median lead time of 2.8 months (range, 0–12.9 months). Longitudinally, ctDNA detection at any time point was associated with shorter RFS (HR, 16.1; 95% CI, 1.63–158.9; p
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?