Identifying Contradictions of Integrating Life-Cycle Costing in Design Practices

M. Saridaki,K. Haugbølle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2516-285320190000002038

2019-05-01

Abstract:Purpose The architecture, engineering and construction industry faces several challenges when performing life-cycle cost calculations. On the basis of activity theory, this study aims at improving our understanding of the current cost calculation in design practices as an activity system with a number of built-in contradictions. Design/Methodology/Approach Drawing on one of the authors’ practical experience from a design office, the research design comprises a paradigmatic case study of a Danish architecture firm, in which data are gathered through documents, observations, interviews and physical artefacts. Moreover, this paper applies a literature review on barriers for adopting life-cycle costing. Findings The paper identifies a number of primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary contradictions between practices of design, cost calculations and data management. Thus, hypotheses are formulated on how and to what extent these different contradictions shape cost calculations in design practices to obstruct or support the application of life cycle costing principles in design. Research Limitations/Implications This study is part of an ongoing research project. Thus, additional analysis is required before the authors may conclude on final results. Practical Implications This paper identifies a number of factors that obstruct or support the implementation of life cycle costing in current design practices. Originality/Value This paper provides new insights into the various contradictions that shape data management in architectural offices as a prerequisite for improving life cycle design practices.

Business,Engineering,Computer Science