Abstract:Abstract The study of treatment effects is often complicated by noncompliance and missing data. In the one-sided noncompliance setting where of interest are the complier and noncomplier average causal effects, we address outcome missingness of the latent missing at random type (LMAR, also known as latent ignorability). That is, conditional on covariates and treatment assigned, the missingness may depend on compliance type. Within the instrumental variable (IV) approach to noncompliance, methods have been proposed for handling LMAR outcome that additionally invoke an exclusion restriction-type assumption on missingness, but no solution has been proposed for when a non-IV approach is used. This article focuses on effect identification in the presence of LMAR outcomes, with a view to flexibly accommodate different principal identification approaches. We show that under treatment assignment ignorability and LMAR only, effect nonidentifiability boils down to a set of two connected mixture equations involving unidentified stratum-specific response probabilities and outcome means. This clarifies that (except for a special case) effect identification generally requires two additional assumptions: a specific missingness mechanism assumption and a principal identification assumption. This provides a template for identifying effects based on separate choices of these assumptions. We consider a range of specific missingness assumptions, including those that have appeared in the literature and some new ones. Incidentally, we find an issue in the existing assumptions, and propose a modification of the assumptions to avoid the issue. Results under different assumptions are illustrated using data from the Baltimore Experience Corps Trial.

On the Identifying Power of Monotonicity for Average Treatment Effects

A vector monotonicity assumption for multiple instruments

IDENTIFICATION AND INFERENCE FOR MARGINAL AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECT ON THE TREATED WITH AN INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE.

Stratifying on Treatment Status

Identification of multi-valued treatment effects with unobserved heterogeneity

Unordered Monotonicity

Bounded, efficient and multiply robust estimation of average treatment effects using instrumental variables

Nonparametric Bounds on Treatment Effects with Imperfect Instruments

Partial Identification of the Average Treatment Effect with Stochastic Counterfactuals and Discordant Twins

Doubly robust estimation of average treatment effect revisited

ASSESSING THE TREATMENT EFFECT HETEROGENEITY WITH A LATENT VARIABLE

Identification of complier and noncomplier average causal effects in the presence of latent missing-at-random (LMAR) outcomes: a unifying view and choices of assumptions

Contrasting Identifying Assumptions of Average Causal Effects: Robustness and Semiparametric Efficiency

Selective Machine Learning of the Average Treatment Effect with an Invalid Instrumental Variable

Estimating Average Treatment Effects: Supplementary Analyses and Remaining Challenges

Efficient Covariate Balancing for the Local Average Treatment Effect

Decomposing Identification Gains and Evaluating Instrument Identification Power for Partially Identified Average Treatment Effects

Testing Partial Instrument Monotonicity

COMPLEMENTARITY AND IDENTIFICATION

Uniformly Semiparametric Ecient Estimation of Treatment Eects with a Continuous Treatment

Conflating marginal and conditional treatment effects: Comments on 'Assessing the performance of population adjustment methods for anchored indirect comparisons: A simulation study'