Spectral analysis comparison of pushbroom and snapshot hyperspectral cameras for in vivo brain tissues and chromophore identification

Alberto Martín-Pérez,Alejandro Martinez de Ternero,Alfonso Lagares,Eduardo Juarez,César Sanz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jbo.29.9.093510
IF: 3.758
2024-09-25
Journal of Biomedical Optics
Abstract:SignificanceHyperspectral imaging sensors have rapidly advanced, aiding in tumor diagnostics for in vivo brain tumors. Linescan cameras effectively distinguish between pathological and healthy tissue, whereas snapshot cameras offer a potential alternative to reduce acquisition time.AimOur research compares linescan and snapshot hyperspectral cameras for in vivo brain tissues and chromophore identification.ApproachWe compared a linescan pushbroom camera and a snapshot camera using images from 10 patients with various pathologies. Objective comparisons were made using unnormalized and normalized data for healthy and pathological tissues. We utilized the interquartile range (IQR) for the spectral angle mapping (SAM), the goodness-of-fit coefficient (GFC), and the root mean square error (RMSE) within the 659.95 to 951.42 nm range. In addition, we assessed the ability of both cameras to capture tissue chromophores by analyzing absorbance from reflectance information.ResultsThe SAM metric indicates reduced dispersion and high similarity between cameras for pathological samples, with a 9.68% IQR for normalized data compared with 2.38% for unnormalized data. This pattern is consistent across GFC and RMSE metrics, regardless of tissue type. Moreover, both cameras could identify absorption peaks of certain chromophores. For instance, using the absorbance measurements of the linescan camera, we obtained SAM values below 0.235 for four peaks, regardless of the tissue and type of data under inspection. These peaks are one for cytochrome b in its oxidized form at λ=422 nm, two for HbO2 at λ=542 nm and λ=576 nm, and one for water at λ=976 nm.ConclusionThe spectral signatures of the cameras show more similarity with unnormalized data, likely due to snapshot sensor noise, resulting in noisier signatures post-normalization. Comparisons in this study suggest that snapshot cameras might be viable alternatives to linescan cameras for real-time brain tissue identification.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,biochemical research methods,optics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?