Karima Addetia,Tatsuya Miyoshi,Vivekanandan Amuthan,Rodolfo Citro,Masao Daimon,Pedro Gutierrez Fajardo,Ravi R. Kasliwal,James N. Kirkpatrick,Mark J. Monaghan,Denisa Muraru,Kofo O. Ogunyankin,Seung Woo Park,Ricardo E. Ronderos,Anita Sadeghpour,Gregory M. Scalia,Masaaki Takeuchi,Wendy Tsang,Edwin S. Tucay,Ana Clara Tude Rodrigues,Yun Zhang,Niklas Hitschrich,Michael Blankenhagen,Markus Degel,Marcus Schreckenberg,Victor Mor-Avi,Federico M. Asch,Roberto M. Lang,WASE Investigators,Aldo D. Prado,Eduardo Filipini,Agatha Kwon,Samantha Hoschke-Edwards,Tania Regina Afonso,Babitha Thampinathan,Maala Sooriyakanthan,Tiangang Zhu,Zhilong Wang,Yingbin Wang,Lixue Yin,Shuang Li,R. Alagesan,S. Balasubramanian,R.V.A. Ananth,Manish Bansal,Luigi Badano,Eduardo Bossone,Davide Di Vece,Michele Bellino,Tomoko Nakao,Takayuki Kawata,Megumi Hirokawa,Naoko Sawada,Yousuke Nabeshima,Hye Rim Yun,Ji-Won Hwang

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Echocardiography remains the most widely used modality to assess left ventricular (LV) chamber size and function. Currently this assessment is most frequently performed using two-dimensional (2D) echocardiography. However, three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography has been shown to be more accurate and reproducible than 2D echocardiography. Current normative reference values for 3D LV analysis are based predominantly on data from North America and Europe. The World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography study was designed to sample normal subjects from around the world to provide more universal global reference ranges. The aim of this study was to assess the worldwide feasibility of LV 3D echocardiography and report on size and functional measurements.METHODS: A total of 2,262 healthy subjects were prospectively enrolled from 19 centers in 15 countries. Three-dimensional LV full-volume data sets were obtained and analyzed offline using vendor-neutral software. Measurements included LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS), and global circumferential strain. Results were categorized by age (18-40, 41-65, and >65 years), sex, and race.RESULTS: A total of 1,589 subjects (feasibility 70%) had adequate LV data sets for analysis. Mean normal values for indexed end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, and LVEF in men and women were 70 ± 15 and 65 ± 12 mL/m<sup>2</sup>, 28 ± 7 and 25 ± 6 mL/m<sup>2</sup>, and 60 ± 5% and 62 ± 5%, respectively. Men had larger LV volumes and lower LVEFs than women. GLS and global circumferential strain were higher in magnitude in women. In both sexes, LV volumes were lower and LVEF tended to be higher with increasing age, especially considering the differences between the youngest and oldest age groups. Although GLS was similar across age groups in men, in women, the youngest and middle-age cohorts revealed higher magnitudes of GLS compared with the oldest age group. Global circumferential strain was higher in magnitude at older age in both men and women. Finally, Asians had smaller chamber sizes and higher LVEFs and absolute strain values than both blacks and whites.CONCLUSIONS: Age, sex, and race should be considered when defining normal reference values for LV dimension and functional parameters obtained by 3D echocardiography.

Two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic normal reference ranges for proximal aorta dimensions: results from the EACVI NORRE study

Normal Values of Aortic Root Size According to Age, Sex, and Race: Results of the World Alliance of Societies of Echocardiography Study

Reference values for echocardiographic assessment of the diameter of the aortic root and ascending aorta spanning all age categories

Observational study of regional aortic size referenced to body size: production of a cardiovascular magnetic resonance nomogram

Echocardiographic reference ranges for normal left atrial function parameters: results from the EACVI NORRE study

Aortic size assessment by noncontrast cardiac computed tomography: normal limits by age, gender, and body surface area

Normal limits in relation to age, body size and gender of two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in persons ≥15 years of age

Aortic dimensions in a large Australian adult cohort. New normal range?

Comparisons of Two-dimensional Echocardiographic Aortic Dimensions between Chinese, Japanese, and Europeans

Normal Values of Left Ventricular Size and Function on Three-Dimensional Echocardiography: Results of the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography Study

Reference Values for Cardiac and Aortic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Healthy, Young Caucasian Adults

MRI measurements of the thoracic aorta and pulmonary artery

Aortic Root Dimension Using Transthoracic Echocardiography: Results from the Copenhagen City Heart Study

Are Aortic Root and Ascending Aorta Diameters Measured by the Pediatric versus the Adult American Society of Echocardiography Guidelines Interchangeable?

Normative computed tomography angiography values of the aortic root, aorta, and aortic arch in children

Normal Values of Right Atrial Size and Function According to Age, Sex, and Ethnicity: Results of the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography Study

Dynamic Normal Aortic Root Diameters: Implications for Aortic Root Reconstruction.

Normal Values of Three-Dimensional Right Ventricular Size and Function Measurements: Results of the World Alliance Societies of Echocardiography Study

Revisiting the Normal Ranges of Aortic Valve Area in 2D Echocardiography and Its Association With Age, Sex, and Anthropometric Characteristics

Normative Values of Pediatric Thoracic Aortic Diameters Indexed to Body Surface Area Using Computed Tomography

Normal Reference Intervals for Cardiac Dimensions and Function for Use in Echocardiographic Practice: A Guideline from the British Society of Echocardiography