Protein kinase C epsilon contributes to chronic mechanoreflex sensitization in rats with heart failure

Alec L. E. Butenas,Shannon K. Parr,Joseph S. Flax,Raimi J. Carroll,Ashley M. Baranczuk,Carl J. Ade,K. Sue Hageman,Timothy I. Musch,Steven W. Copp
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jp287020
2024-09-14
The Journal of Physiology
Abstract:figure legend Skeletal muscle contraction leads to exaggerated reflex increases in sympathetic nerve activity in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HF‐rEF) which raises cardiovascular risk and impairs exercise tolerance. This is partly due to chronic sensitization of mechanically sensitive group III/IV muscle afferents via Gq protein‐coupled thromboxane A2 (TxA2) and bradykinin B2 receptor signalling. The specific Gq protein‐linked signalling mechanisms underlying this sensitization have not been fully explored, though indirect evidence strongly suggests the involvement of either inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate (IP3) receptors and/or protein kinase C epsilon (PKCε). Our findings demonstrate that PKCε, but not IP3 receptors, within sensory endings of thin fibre muscle afferents play a role in the mechanoreflex sensitization in HF‐rEF rats. We investigated second‐messenger signalling components linked to the stimulation of Gq protein‐coupled receptors (e.g. thromboxane A2 and bradykinin B2 receptors) on the sensory endings of thin fibre muscle afferents in the chronic mechanoreflex sensitization in rats with myocardial infarction‐induced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HF‐rEF). We hypothesized that injection of either the inositol 1,4,5‐trisphosphate (IP3) receptor antagonist xestospongin C (5 μg) or the PKCε translocation inhibitor PKCe141 (45 μg) into the arterial supply of the hindlimb would reduce the increase in renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) evoked during 30 s of 1 Hz dynamic hindlimb muscle stretch in decerebrate, unanaesthetized HF‐rEF rats but not sham‐operated controls (SHAM). Ejection fraction was significantly reduced in HF‐rEF (45 (19)%) compared to SHAM (80 (9)%; P
neurosciences,physiology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?