Menstrual Products: Attitudes About Taxation and Safety

Trupti Dhumal,Pragya Rai,Drishti Shah,Pamela W. Murray,Kimberly M. Kelly
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2023.0090
2024-02-28
Journal of Women s Health
Abstract:Background: This study explored factors associated with the differences between women and men in attitudes, norms, and the support of taxation of menstrual products (MPs) and menstrual-adjacent products. It also investigated the use of these products in women. Methods: Young adults from 18 to 30 years of age were recruited via social media, listserve emails, and flyers placed throughout a university campus. Following cognitive interviewing, a survey investigated attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors associated with MPs. Results: Individuals self-identified as men or women. Women ( n = 154) had more positive general attitudes, less positive safety attitudes, and less support for taxation of MPs than men ( n = 43). Regression analyses indicated that factors, such as race, age, attitudes, norms, and taxation, were associated with product use. Conclusions: Attitudes about safety and taxation differ for men and women. Tax policies and attitude-shifting interventions need to be tailored to their audience, and our study can inform that effort.
medicine, general & internal,public, environmental & occupational health,obstetrics & gynecology,womens studies
What problem does this paper attempt to address?