Abstract:Hidden code clones negatively impact software maintenance, but manually detecting them in large codebases is impractical. Additionally, automated approaches find detection of syntactically‐divergent clones very challenging. While recent deep neural networks (for example BERT‐based artificial neural networks) seem more effective in detecting such clones, their pairwise comparison of every code pair in the target system(s) is inefficient and scales poorly on large codebases. We present SSCD, a BERT‐based clone detection approach that targets high recall of Type 3 and Type 4 clones at a very large scale (in line with our industrial partner's requirements). It computes a representative embedding for each code fragment and finds similar fragments using a nearest neighbor search. Thus, SSCD avoids the pairwise‐comparison bottleneck of other neural network approaches, while also using a parallel, GPU‐accelerated search to tackle scalability. This article describes the approach, proposing and evaluating several refinements to improve Type 3/4 clone detection at scale. It provides a substantial empirical evaluation of the technique, including a speed/efficacy comparison of the approach against SourcererCC and Oreo, the only other neural‐network approach currently capable of scaling to hundreds of millions of LOC. It also includes a large in‐situ evaluation on our industrial collaborator's code base that assesses the original technique, the impact of the proposed refinements and illustrates the impact of incremental, active learning on its efficacy. We find that SSCD is significantly faster and more accurate than SourcererCC and Oreo. SAGA, a GPU‐accelerated traditional clone detection approach, is a little better than SSCD for T1/T2 clones, but substantially worse for T3/T4 clones. Thus, SSCD is both scalable to industrial code sizes, and comparatively more accurate than existing approaches for difficult T3/T4 clone searching. In‐situ evaluation on company datasets shows that SSCD outperforms the baseline approach (CCFinderX) for T3/T4 clones. Whitespace removal and active learning further improve SSCD effectiveness.

Evaluating few-shot and contrastive learning methods for code clone detection

Code Clone Detection: A Literature Review

Assessing and Improving Dataset and Evaluation Methodology in Deep Learning for Code Clone Detection

Evaluation of Contrastive Learning with Various Code Representations for Code Clone Detection

AdaCCD: Adaptive Semantic Contrasts Discovery Based Cross Lingual Adaptation for Code Clone Detection

A Machine Learning Based Framework for Code Clone Validation

Investigating the Efficacy of Large Language Models for Code Clone Detection

Are our clone detectors good enough? An empirical study of code effects by obfuscation

CC2Vec: Combining Typed Tokens with Contrastive Learning for Effective Code Clone Detection

CLCD-I: Cross-Language Clone Detection by Using Deep Learning with InferCode

CCT-Code: Cross-Consistency Training for Multilingual Clone Detection and Code Search

Assessing and Improving an Evaluation Dataset for Detecting Semantic Code Clones Via Deep Learning

CONCORD: Clone-aware Contrastive Learning for Source Code

ZC3: Zero-Shot Cross-Language Code Clone Detection

An ensemble learning approach for software semantic clone detection

Towards Understanding the Capability of Large Language Models on Code Clone Detection: A Survey

Using a Nearest-Neighbour, BERT-Based Approach for Scalable Clone Detection

Code Clone Detection Method for Large-Scale Source Code

Code Similarity in Clone Detection

Nearest‐neighbor, BERT‐based, scalable clone detection: A practical approach for large‐scale industrial code bases

Challenging Machine Learning-based Clone Detectors via Semantic-preserving Code Transformations