Treatment of vedolizumab with exclusive enteral nutrition in adult patients with moderate to severe Crohn's Disease (CEEN Study)

Jing Wang,Zhishun Tang,Jiao Li,Anning Yin,Yaqing Xu,Liping Zou,Haixia Ren,Jian Kang,Juan Su,Qian Zhou,Yang Wang,Wei Wang,Jing Zhang,Huipeng Wan,Ping An
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14309/ctg.0000000000000759
2024-08-24
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Despite increasing studies confirming the efficacy of vedolizumab in Crohn's disease (CD), improving the responses to this biologic agent remains challenging in clinical practice. Here, we investigated the efficacy of combined treatment of vedolizumab and 16-week exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) in moderately to severely active CD. METHODS: From October 2020 to October 2023, 81 patients with moderately to severely active CD treated with vedolizumab from three IBD centers were retrospectively selected. Forty-one patients received treatment of vedolizumab with concomitant 16-week EEN (vedolizumab, VDZ+EEN cohort) and 40 patients received vedolizumab treatment alone (VDZ cohort). Clinical and biological outcomes were evaluated. Endoscopic response and mucosal healing were assessed by colonoscopy at week 16 and 52. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between two groups at baseline for demographic and clinical characteristics. Compared to patients treated with vedolizumab alone, patients in the VDZ+EEN cohort achieved higher rates of clinical response (84.2% vs. 40.0%), clinical remission (81.6% vs. 30.0%), endoscopic response (91.4 % vs. 34.6%) including mucosal healing (85.7% vs. 26.9%) at week 16. The superiority of VDZ+EEN treatment sustained in maintenance, with 76.7% (vs. 33.3%) clinical response, 70.0% (vs. 26.7%) clinical remission, 76.9% (vs. 33.3%) endoscopic response, and 61.5% (vs. 26.7%) mucosal healing at week 52. None of patients experienced severe adverse events. CONCLUSION: Vedolizumab with concomitant 16-week EEN might be an effective and optimized approach with solid efficacy in the induction and maintenance treatment of active CD.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?