Clinical Outcomes and Efficacy of HER2-targeted Therapy in Breast Cancer with Uncommon in Situ Hybridization (ISH) Patterns or Discordant Immunohistochemistry (IHC).
Qianchen Zhang,Jincong Q. Freeman,Fangyuan Zhao,Nan Chen,Rita Nanda,Dezheng Huo,Frederick Matthew Howard
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.604
IF: 45.3
2024-01-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:604 Background: HER2-targeted therapy (Tx) improves outcomes in HER2+ breast cancer, but efficacy in patients (pts) with discordant IHC/ISH results, or with ASCO/CAP Group 2–4 ISH results (representing mono/polysomy and borderline positivity), remains uncertain. We sought to characterize the epidemiology and response to HER2-directed Tx in these subgroups. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included pts from the National Cancer Database diagnosed in 2013 - 2020. Cases were classified as HER2+, HER2–, discordant ISH/IHC, or HER2+ with ISH Group 2 (HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 2, HER2 copy number [CN] < 4), 3 (ratio < 2, CN > 6), or 4 (ratio < 2, CN ≥ 4 and < 6) per the 2023 ASCO/CAP guidelines. In pts receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with HER2-targeted Tx, odds ratio (OR) for pathologic complete response (pCR) was calculated adjusting for age, comorbidity, stage, and hormone receptor expression, for HER2+ subgroups relative to HER2– cases; pCR rate was also compared between pts who did vs. did not receive HER2-targeted Tx. Adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) in Stage IV pts was calculated relative to HER2– cases, and as a function of receipt of HER2-targeted Tx. Results: We identified 1,105,890 cases for inclusion (mean age, 62 years; median follow-up, 43 months). Of HER2 IHC 3+ cases with dual probe ISH testing (n=6808), 9.4%, 4.2%, 2.7%, and 8.2% had ISH results classified as ASCO/CAP Group 5 (i.e. discordant negative), 4, 3, and 2, respectively. Of HER2 IHC 0 or 1+ cases with dual probe ISH (n=47,817), 2.4% had discordant positive Group 1 ISH results. Among 148,099 pts receiving NAC, HER2+ and Group 2 IHC 3+ treated with HER2-targeted Tx had higher pCR rates than HER2– cases (Table), with no pCR improvement seen in Group 3/4 ISH or discordant ISH/IHC cases. Few pts in HER2+ subgroups did not receive HER2-directed Tx, but improved pCR with HER2-targeted Tx was seen in HER2+ cases with a trend toward improvement in Group 2 ISH cases. Similarly, OS was superior in Stage IV HER2+ (HR 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 - 0.53) and Group 2/IHC 3+ cases (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.10 – 0.77) receiving HER2-targeted Tx relative to HER2– cases. Conclusions: HER2+ cases with ASCO/CAP Group 3/4 ISH results, as well as pts with discordant ISH/IHC have inferior outcomes with HER2-targeted Tx, and alternative treatment strategies for these pts incorporating agents approved for HER2– disease should be considered. [Table: see text]