Personalized model to predict keratoconus progression from demographic, topographic and genetic data

Howard P Maile,Ji-Peng Olivia Li,Mary D Fortune,Patrick Royston,Marcello T Leucci,Ismail Moghul,Anita Szabo,Konstantinos Balaskas,Bruce D Allan,Alison J Hardcastle,Pirro Hysi,Nikolas Pontikos,Stephen J Tuft,Daniel M Gore
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2022.04.004
IF: 5.488
2022-04-01
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Abstract:PurposeTo generate a prognostic model to predict keratoconus progression to corneal cross-linking (CXL).DesignRetrospective cohort study.MethodsWe recruited 5025 patients (9341 eyes) with early keratoconus between January 2011 and November 2020. Genetic data from 926 patients was available. We investigated both keratometry or CXL as end-points for progression and used the Royston-Parmar method on the proportional hazards scale to generate a prognostic model. We calculated hazard ratios (HR) for each significant covariate, with explained variation and discrimination, and performed internal-external cross validation by geographic regions.ResultsAfter exclusions, model-fitting comprised 8701 eyes, of which 3232 underwent CXL. For early keratoconus, CXL provided a more robust prognostic model than keratometric progression. The final model explained 33% of the variation in time-to-event: age HR [95% confidence limits] 0.9 [0.90-0.91], maximum anterior keratometry (Kmax) 1.08 [1.07-1.09], and minimum corneal thickness 0.95 [0.93-0.96] as significant covariates. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with keratoconus (n=28) did not significantly contribute to the model. The predicted time-to-event curves closely followed the observed curves during internal-external validation. Differences in discrimination between geographic regions was low, suggesting the model maintained its predictive ability.ConclusionsA prognostic model to predict keratoconus progression could aid patient empowerment, triage and service provision. Age at presentation is the most significant predictor of progression risk. Candidate SNPs associated with keratoconus do not contribute to progression risk.
ophthalmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?