Comparison of patients with isolated cutaneous erythematosus (CLE) versus SLE with CLE as the sole clinical feature: a monocentric study of 149 patients
Clémence Masseran,Laura Perray,Quitterie Murat de Montai,Alexis Mathian,Alexandre Teboul,Camille Francès,Laurent Arnaud,Nathalie Costedoat-Chalumeau,Annick Barbaud,Zahir Amoura,Delphine S. Courvoisier,François Chasset
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2024.01.041
IF: 15.487
2024-02-03
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Abstract:Background Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) may present as an isolated entity or be classified as Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) by the presence of laboratory abnormalities including cytopenia, low complement levels and/or autoantibodies (CLE with laboratory SLE). Objective To compare isolated CLE and CLE with laboratory SLE and to validate an existing 3-items score with age <25 years (1 point), phototypes V-VI (1 point), antinuclear antibodies ≥1:320 (5 points) to predict the risk of progression from CLE to severe SLE. Methods Monocentric cohort study including consecutive CLE patients. CLE with laboratory SLE was defined by 2019 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for SLE score of ≥ 10 points at baseline with CLE as the sole clinical feature. Results Of the 149 CLE patients, 20 had CLE with laboratory SLE. Median follow-up duration was 11.3 years (IQR: 5.1-20.5). Ten patients (7%) developed severe SLE. In survival analysis, the risk of progression to severe SLE was higher among CLE with laboratory SLE (HR=6.69, [95%CI: 1.93-23.14], p<0.001) compared to isolated CLE. In both groups, none of the patient with a risk score ≤ 2 developed severe SLE. Limitations Monocentric study with limited number of patients Conclusion CLE with laboratory SLE patients have higher risk of progression to severe SLE than isolated CLE.
dermatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?