'Efficacy of biologics in NSAID-ERD: United airways from the nose to the bronchi'

Kathleen M. Buchheit,Elke Vandewalle,Hester Elzinga,Sietze Reitsma,Wytske Fokkens,Phillippe Geveart
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.09.021
IF: 11.022
2024-09-29
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice
Abstract:NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (NSAID-ERD), the clinical triad of severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), asthma, and respiratory reactions to cyclooxygenase 1 inhibitors, is often challenging to manage, with many patients failing first line therapies for CRSwNP and asthma. There are now six biologic mediations approved for asthma and/or severe CRSwNP: omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab and tezepelumab. With the availability of respiratory biologic treatment for both asthma and CRSwNP, clinicians now have a multitude of additional management options for patients with NSAID-ERD. Herein we will review the currently available clinical trial and real-world evidence for biologic efficacy and safety patients with NSAID-ERD, discuss the mechanisms of biologic therapy specific to NSAID-ERD, and review evidence regarding the use of biologic therapy versus endoscopic sinus surgery therapy for CRSwNP and NSAID-ERD. We will propose a management approach for choosing biologic therapy or endoscopic sinus surgery with aspirin therapy after desensitization for patients with NSAID-ERD.
immunology,allergy
What problem does this paper attempt to address?