A tool to assess the quality of a meta‐analysis
Julian PT Higgins, Peter W Lane, Betsy Anagnostelis, Judith Anzures‐Cabrera, Nigel F Baker, Joseph C Cappelleri, Scott Haughie, Sally Hollis, Steff C Lewis, Patrick Moneuse, Anne Whitehead
2013-12-01
Abstract:Background Because meta‐analyses are increasingly prevalent and cited in the medical literature, it is important that tools are available to assess their methodological quality. When performing an empirical study of the quality of published meta‐analyses, we found that existing tools did not place a strong emphasis on statistical and interpretational issues. Methods We developed a quality‐assessment tool using existing materials and expert judgment as a starting point, followed by multiple iterations of input from our working group, piloting, and discussion. After having used the tool for our empirical study, agreement for four key items in the tool was measured using weighted kappa coefficients. Results Our tool contained 43 items divided into four key areas (data sources, analysis of individual studies, meta‐analysis methods, and interpretation), and each area ended with a summary question. We also produced …