Abstract:Pathogen spillover between host populations with different movement strategies is a ubiquitous phenomenon relevant to wildlife, agriculture and human health. Our study advances our ability to predict the outcomes of spillover events by unpacking how differences in tolerance to infection and pace of life between host populations influence pathogen evolution. Changes to migration routes and phenology create novel contact patterns among hosts and pathogens. These novel contact patterns can lead to pathogens spilling over between resident and migrant populations. Predicting the consequences of such pathogen spillover events requires understanding how pathogen evolution depends on host movement behaviour. Following spillover, pathogens may evolve changes in their transmission rate and virulence phenotypes because different strategies are favoured by resident and migrant host populations. There is conflict in current theoretical predictions about what those differences might be. Some theory predicts lower pathogen virulence and transmission rates in migrant populations because migrants have lower tolerance to infection. Other theoretical work predicts higher pathogen virulence and transmission rates in migrants because migrants have more contacts with susceptible hosts. We aim to understand how differences in tolerance to infection and host pace of life act together to determine the direction of pathogen evolution following pathogen spillover from a resident to a migrant population. We constructed a spatially implicit model in which we investigate how pathogen strategy changes following the addition of a migrant population. We investigate how differences in tolerance to infection and pace of life between residents and migrants determine the effect of spillover on pathogen evolution and host population size. When the paces of life of the migrant and resident hosts are equal, larger costs of infection in the migrants lead to lower pathogen transmission rate and virulence following spillover. When the tolerance to infection in migrant and resident populations is equal, faster migrant paces of life lead to increased transmission rate and virulence following spillover. However, the opposite can also occur: when the migrant population has lower tolerance to infection, faster migrant paces of life can lead to decreases in transmission rate and virulence. Predicting the outcomes of pathogen spillover requires accounting for both differences in tolerance to infection and pace of life between populations. It is also important to consider how movement patterns of populations affect host contact opportunities for pathogens. These results have implications for wildlife conservation, agriculture and human health.

Effects of migratory animals on resident parasite dynamics

A unifying framework for the transient parasite dynamics of migratory hosts

Effect of resistant compartment on pathogen strategy in partially migratory populations

Effects of predation risk on parasite–host interactions and wildlife diseases

Pathogen evolution following spillover from a resident to a migrant host population depends on interactions between host pace of life and tolerance to infection

Effects of migration on vector-borne diseases with forward and backward stage progression

Spatial effects in parasite induced marine diseases of immobile hosts

Long-distance movement dynamics shape host microbiome richness and turnover

The role of manipulative trophically transmitted parasites in the stability of a predator–prey community

Host and parasite identity interact in scale-dependent fashion to determine parasite community structure

Host movement dominates the predicted effects of climate change on parasite transmission between wild and domestic mountain ungulates

Parasite infection induces size-dependent host dispersal: consequences for parasite persistence

Interactions between migration and immunity among oriental armyworm populations infected with the insect pathogenic fungus, Beauveria bassiana

The impact of within-host coinfection interactions on between-host parasite transmission dynamics varies with spatial scale

Parasite prevalence is determined by infection state- and risk-dependent dispersal of the host

Nonrandom foraging and resource distributions affect the relationships between host density, contact rates and parasite transmission

Migration Effects on Population Dynamics of the Honeybee-mite Interactions

Parasite-mediated predation determines infection in a complex predator–prey–parasite system

Global redistribution and local migration in semi-discrete host-parasitoid population dynamic models

Refuge distributions and landscape connectivity affect host-parasitoid dynamics: Motivations for biological control in agroecosystems

Biomechanics of parasite migration within hosts