Impact of weight adjusted high frequency low tidal volume ventilation and atrial pacing in lesion metrics in high‐power short‐duration ablation: Results of a pilot study

Fabricio Vassallo,Carlos Volponi,Christiano Cunha,Lucas Corcino,Eduardo Serpa,Aloyr Simoes,Dalbian Gasparini,Luiz Fernando Barbosa,Andre Schmidt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16245
IF: 2.7
2024-03-15
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Abstract:Left and right half of figure presenting anterior and posterior walls lesion size index (LSI) and local impedance drop (LID) of weight adjusted ventilation + atrial pacing and standard ventilation + sinus rhythm groups, respectively. At bottle comparison between LSI results between both groups. Introduction Lesion size index (LSI) was introduced with the use of TacticathTM and as a surrogate of lesion quality. The metric used to achieve the predetermined values involves combined information of contact force (CF), power and radiofrequency time. Rapid atrial pacing (RAP) and high‐frequency low‐tidal volume ventilation (HFLTV) independently or in combination improve catheter stability and CF and quality of lesions. Data of the impact of body weight adjusted HFLTV ventilation strategy associated with RAP in the lesion metrics still lacking. The study aimed to compare the results of high‐power short‐duration (HPSD) atrial fibrillation ablation using simultaneous weight adjusted HFLTV and RAP and standard ventilation (SV) protocol. Methods Prospective, nonrandomized study with 136 patients undergoing de novo ablation divided into two groups; 70 in RAP (100 ppm) + HFLTV with 4 mL/kg of tidal volume and 25 breaths/min (group A) and 66 patients with SV in intrinsic sinus rhythm (group B). Ablation using 50 W, CF of 5–10 g/10–20 g and 40 mL/minute flow rate on the posterior and anterior left atrial wall, respectively. Results No procedure‐related complications. Group A: Mean LSI points 70 ± 16.5, mean total lower LSI 3.4 ± 0.5, mean total higher LSI 8.2 ± 0.4 and mean total LSI 5.6 ± 0.6. Anterior and posterior wall mean total LSI was 6.0 ± 0.4 and 4.2 ± 0.3, respectively. Mean local impedance drop (LID) points were 118.8 ± 28.4, mean LID index (%) 12.9 ± 1.5, and mean LID
cardiac & cardiovascular systems
What problem does this paper attempt to address?