Methods for Clinical Monitoring of Neuromuscular Transmission in Anesthesiology – A Review
Paweł Radkowski,Agnieszka Barańska,Marcin Mieszkowski,Justyna Dawidowska-Fidrych,Katarzyna Podhorodecka
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s424555
IF: 2.145
2024-01-03
International Journal of General Medicine
Abstract:Pawe&lstrok Radkowski, 1– 3 Agnieszka Bara&nacuteska, 1 Marcin Mieszkowski, 1, 2 Justyna Dawidowska-Fidrych, 4 Katarzyna Podhorodecka 1 1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Regional Specialist Teaching Hospital, Olsztyn, Poland; 2 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, School of Medicine, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland; 3 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hospital zum heiligen Geist, Fritzlar, Germany; 4 Pediatric Department, Hospital Pro-Medica, E&lstrokk, Poland Correspondence: Katarzyna Podhorodecka, Email The administration of general anesthesia is a crucial aspect of surgery. However, it can pose significant risks to patients, such as respiratory depression and prolonged neuromuscular blockade. To avoid such complications, it is essential to monitor neuromuscular transmission during anesthesia. While clinical tests have been used for decades to evaluate muscle function, they are now known to be unreliable, and relying on them increases the risk of postoperative complications. Thankfully, there are now six methods available for neuromuscular monitoring during anesthesia: mechanomyography, acceleromyography, electromyography, kinemyography, phonomyography, and compressomyography. Each of these methods differs in terms of their approach and methodology, and their importance in clinical practice varies accordingly. Mechanomyography involves measuring the mechanical response of a muscle to nerve stimulation, while acceleromyography measures the acceleration of muscle contraction. Electromyography records the electrical activity of muscles, while kinemyography tracks muscle movement. Phonomyography records the sound waves produced by contracting muscles, and compressomyography involves monitoring the pressure changes in a muscle during contraction. Overall, understanding the differences between these methods and their clinical significance is crucial for anesthesiologists. This review aims to provide an updated understanding of the current methods available for neuromuscular monitoring during anesthesia, so that anesthesiologists can make informed decisions about patient care and reduce the risk of postoperative complications. Keywords: neuromuscular monitoring, neuromuscular blockade, peripheral nerve stimulation, anesthesiology, review Neuromuscular monitoring is a relatively young branch of medicine and neurophysiology. The discovery of its basic functions took place in 1941, when Harvey and Masland discovered a decrease in muscle response after repetitive stimulation. 1 14 years later Botelho made the first measurements using mechanomyography and electromyography. 2 In 1958, Christie and Churchill-Davidson constructed the first tool to monitor intraoperative neuromuscular transmission – St. Thomas Hospital's Nerve Stimulator. 3 The first reports of guidelines for dealing with patients treated with non-depolarizing muscle relaxants were published in 2009 at the initiative of the Working Party on Post Anaesthesia Care. 4 In 2018, a group of experts set basic guidelines for dealing with patients treated with muscle relaxants. 5 They argue that any patient given a non-depolarizing relaxant should be subjected to objective neuromuscular monitoring, as neither subjective methods nor clinical tests are sufficiently sensitive to detect residual neuromuscular blockade and should not be practiced. There is an emphasis on the fact that there should be guidelines for managing patients that are administered muscle relaxants and to standardize the time frames measured that are associated with this procedure. 4 The most common technique for assessing the degree of muscle relaxation and neuromuscular conduction is by train of four (TOF). 6 This method involves sending a series of four electrical pulses every 0.5 seconds in 10 second intervals, through electrodes attached to an easily accessible peripheral nerve. The muscle response to the stimulation described above is evaluated. On this basis, the TOF ratio is calculated, ie the ratio of 4th to the 1st response (T4/T1). Based on current knowledge, patients can be safely extubated once the TOF ratio > 0.9 whereas a TOF ratio <0.9 is predictive of striated muscle relaxation. 7 In some countries, Anesthesiology Associations have already published detailed guidelines, eg in the UK and Ireland, it has been highlighted that the need for neuromuscular monitoring in all patients who have been administered muscle relaxants from the time of induction to the complete return of neuromuscular transmission (TOFR> 0.9) and the patient's consciousness. 8 Similar standards have been issued in -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal