Development and Validation of a Novel Predictive Model for the Early Differentiation of Cardiac and Non-Cardiac Syncope
Sijin Wu,Zhongli Chen,Yuan Gao,Songren Shu,Feng Chen,Ying Wu,Yan Dai,Shu Zhang,Keping Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ijgm.s454521
IF: 2.145
2024-03-07
International Journal of General Medicine
Abstract:Sijin Wu, 1 Zhongli Chen, 1 Yuan Gao, 1 Songren Shu, 2 Feng Chen, 1 Ying Wu, 1 Yan Dai, 1 Shu Zhang, 1 Keping Chen 1 1 Arrhythmia Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Keping Chen, Arrhythmia Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 167 Beilishi Road, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100037, People's Republic of China, Email Background: The diagnosis of cardiac syncope remains a challenge. This study sought to develop and validate a diagnostic model for the early identification of individuals likely to have a cardiac cause. Methods: 877 syncope patients with a determined cause were retrospectively enrolled at a tertiary heart center. They were randomly divided into the training set and validation set at a 7:3 ratio. We analyzed the demographic information, medical history, laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, and echocardiogram by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression for selection of key features. Then a multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors and construct a diagnostic model. The receiver operating characteristic curves, area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis were used to evaluate the predictive accuracy and clinical value of this nomogram. Results: Five independent predictors for cardiac syncope were selected: BMI (OR 1.088; 95% CI 1.022– 1.158; P =0.008), chest symptoms preceding syncope (OR 5.251; 95% CI 3.326– 8.288; P < 0.001), logarithmic NT-proBNP (OR 1.463; 95% CI 1.240– 1.727; P < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (OR 0.940; 95% CI 0.908– 0.973; P < 0.001), and abnormal electrocardiogram (OR 6.171; 95% CI 3.966– 9.600; P < 0.001). Subsequently, a nomogram based on a multivariate logistic regression model was developed and validated, yielding AUC of 0.873 (95% CI 0.845– 0.902) and 0.856 (95% CI 0.809– 0.903), respectively. The calibration curves showcased the nomogram's reasonable calibration, and the decision curve analysis demonstrated good clinical utility. Conclusion: A diagnostic tool providing individualized probability predictions for cardiac syncope was developed and validated, which may potentially serve as an effective tool to facilitate early identification of such patients. Keywords: cardiac syncope, syncope, diagnosis, nomogram, prediction model Syncope is the form of transient loss of consciousness that is caused by temporary cerebral hypoperfusion. 1 This symptom is a frequent reason for emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions. 2,3 Determining the underlying cause of syncope can be a challenging and time-consuming process due to its varied etiology. There is substantial heterogeneity in the treatment options and prognosis among different types of syncope. Patients with cardiac syncope face a higher risk for mortality or other adverse events compared with those with vasovagal or orthostatic causes. 1,4,5 Therefore, it is imperative to pinpoint reliable diagnostic features for cardiac syncope and achieve early identification of such patients. Over the past two decades, several syncope prediction models have emerged, incorporating individual or combined clinical parameters derived from clinical history, physical examination, serum biomarkers and electrocardiogram (ECG). 6–12 For instance, the Evaluation of Guidelines in Syncope Study (EGSYS) score, which relies on readily available historical findings, has demonstrated high sensitivity in discriminating cardiac from non-cardiac syncope. 7 These strategies can serve as predictive tools to assist physicians in making clinical judgement. To some degree, they help facilitate early diagnosis, refine risk stratification, and estimate prognosis of patients with syncope. However, owing to their limited reproducibility and remarkable heterogeneity in study design, along with variable definitions across primary studies, none has achieved widespread clinical acceptance and adoption. 13,14 Especially for patients with atypical symptoms or more complex etiologies of syncope, their diagnostic value is relatively limited. After initial evaluation -Abstract Truncated-
medicine, general & internal