Glofitamab as a salvage treatment for B‐cell lymphomas in the real world: A multicenter study in Taiwan

Ya‐Ting Hsu,Shang‐Ju Wu,Hsiao‐Wen Kao,Sheng‐Yen Hsiao,Chun‐Kai Liao,Tsai‐Yun Chen,Ming‐Chung Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.35217
IF: 6.9209
2024-02-04
Cancer
Abstract:Glofitamab is an effective treatment for relapsed and refractory B‐cell lymphomas according to real‐world clinical data from 34 patients in Taiwan, which confirms clinical trial results. Glofitamab is not associated with an apparent risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation. Background Glofitamab is a bispecific antibody with promise for treating relapsed/refractory B‐cell lymphoma according to a phase 1/2 clinical trial. This study examined its real‐world effectiveness. Methods This was an investigator‐initiated, multicenter retrospective study including 34 patients who had relapsed/refractory B‐cell lymphomas after at least three prior lines of therapy and received glofitamab monotherapy in a compassionate use program in Taiwan between January 2021 and October 2022. Results At a median follow‐up of 15.9 months, 56% of patients responded to glofitamab and 23% achieved complete remission. Response to the previous line of therapy significantly correlated with response to glofitamab (p = .020). Most responses were durable; only five out of the 19 responders had documented disease recurrence at the data cutoff date. The estimated progression‐free survival (PFS) was 3.2 months, and the estimated 1‐year PFS was 33% for the entire cohort. PFS was better for responders than nonresponders (median PFS, 16.9 vs. 1.8 months; 1‐year PFS, 60% vs. 0%). Forty‐three cytokine release syndrome (CRS) events were observed, three of which were grade 3; all were manageable without glofitamab discontinuation. No immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity was reported. Among seven hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers (six had antiviral prophylaxis) and 14 patients with remote HBV (four had antiviral prophylaxis), no HBV reactivation was observed. Conclusions In this real‐world cohort, glofitamab exhibited effectiveness comparable to trial results without excessive CRS or new safety issues. With appropriate prophylaxis, glofitamab‐treated patients with chronic or remote HBV infection are unlikely to experience virus reactivation.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?