Abstract:Abstract Background Programme developers have the responsibility of ongoing programme renewal and evaluation to ensure that curricula remain responsive to rapidly changing educational and healthcare contexts. In reporting on programmes, significant emphasis is often placed on content and outcomes of Master’s in Health Professions Education (MHPE) programmes. However, less emphasis has been placed on meaningful evaluation of all aspects of these programmes, particularly from a student perspective including what worked and what needs to be enhanced, as well as any emergent or unplanned factors. As the number of established MHPE programmes increases, so does the need for evaluation models that consider programme complexity. In this article we consider a MHPE programme against a model that provided scope for going beyond ‘did it work?’ Our intention was to determine whether the renewed MPhil in HPE programme was implemented as planned, and to which extent it achieved the planned outcomes. Methods This programme evaluation was conducted in an interpretive paradigm. We collected qualitative data at two points. Firstly, at the start of students’ first-year with voluntary participation in focus groups and secondly, a year later with voluntary participation in individual interviews. Two members of the research team performed the initial thematic analysis of both the focus group interviews and the individual interviews. Thereafter, the full author team worked collaboratively discussing the themes until we reached consensus, looking specifically to identify any “emergent” factors. Results We identified three themes in the student data related to the process of implementing the new programme and the outcomes from it, including those aspects that could be regarded as emergent or unplanned: balancing work, personal lives and studies; managing the hybrid learning approach; and the scholarly journey. Conclusions While many of the outcomes of the renewed programme were met, not all manifested as had been planned. The experience of the programme differed from one student to the next such that at the end of the two years they were at different points in their scholarly journeys. We realised that although we sought to be pedagogically sound in the process of curriculum renewal, we did not take into account the complex matrix of influences that sit outside the formal curriculum. Future renewal activities should intentionally and sensitively consider those factors, both planned and emergent, that influence a student’s journey towards becoming a scholarly teacher and teaching scholar.

How the mapping of threshold concepts across a master's programme in health professions education could support the development of mastersness

Planned or emergent? An evaluation of a Master’s in Health Professions Education programme

A systematic mapping of public health master's and structured doctoral programs in Germany

Thresholds of becoming: an exploration of threshold concepts as a means to support professional identity formation in competency-based curricula

Evaluation of a Master's in Genomic Medicine framework: a national, multi-professional programme to educate healthcare professionals in NHS England.

Mapping competency in public health training – experience of the Europubhealth consortium

Threshold concepts in medical education: A scoping review

Masters in health professions education programs as they choose to represent themselves: A website review

[Concept, implementation and evaluation of an interfaculty Master of Medical Education Programme]

Masters at work: a narrative inquiry into the experiences of mental health nurses qualifying with an undergraduate Masters degree

Evaluating the perceived impact and legacy of master's degree level research in the allied health professions: a UK-wide cross-sectional survey

Exploring heutagogy, knowledge management, and rhizomatic learning approaches in Master�s degree programs

Pain science and practice as a 'threshold concept' within undergraduate and pre-registration physiotherapy education: a jewel of the curriculum?

Qualitative evaluation of a multidisciplinary master of cancer sciences: impacts on graduates and influencing curricular factors

Development of Health Professions Education Competencies for a National Fellowship Program: A Group Consensus Process

Change on the horizon: issues and concerns of neophyte advanced healthcare practitioners

Threshold concept learning: Emotions and liminal space transitions

Work-integrated Learning and Skill Development in a Master of Public Health Program: Graduate Perspectives

Threshold quality parameters in hybrid higher education

Milestones and entrustable professional activities: The key to practically translating competencies for interprofessional education?

Characteristics and motivational factors of candidates applying to the Master in Health Professions Education (MHPE) program