Improved recovery of urinary small extracellular vesicles by differential ultracentrifugation

Ana Teixeira-Marques,Sara Monteiro-Reis,Diana Montezuma,Catarina Lourenço,Miguel Carlos Oliveira,Vera Constâncio,José Pedro Sequeira,Carina Carvalho-Maia,Rui Freitas,Elena S. Martens-Uzunova,M. Helena Vasconcelos,Rui Henrique,Carmen Jerónimo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-62783-9
IF: 4.6
2024-05-30
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are lipid-membrane enclosed structures that are associated with several diseases, including those of genitourinary tract. Urine contains EVs derived from urinary tract cells. Owing to its non-invasive collection, urine represents a promising source of biomarkers for genitourinary disorders, including cancer. The most used method for urinary EVs separation is differential ultracentrifugation (UC), but current protocols lead to a significant loss of EVs hampering its efficiency. Moreover, UC protocols are labor-intensive, further limiting clinical application. Herein, we sought to optimize an UC protocol, reducing the time spent and improving small EVs (SEVs) yield. By testing different ultracentrifugation times at 200,000 g to pellet SEVs, we found that 48 min and 60 min enabled increased SEVs recovery compared to 25 min. A step for pelleting large EVs (LEVs) was also evaluated and compared with filtering of the urine supernatant. We found that urine supernatant filtering resulted in a 1.7-fold increase on SEVs recovery, whereas washing steps resulted in a 0.5 fold-decrease on SEVs yield. Globally, the optimized UC protocol was shown to be more time efficient, recovering higher numbers of SEVs than Exoquick-TC (EXO). Furthermore, the optimized UC protocol preserved RNA quality and quantity, while reducing SEVs separation time.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?