Abstract:Introduction Speaking prospectively we use the concept of "at risk mental state" (ARMS) to describe the state in which a person has a heightened risk of developing a psychotic disorder. Young people who are experiencing ARMS can be more precisely defined as being at ultra-high-risk of psychosis using a specific set of criteria known as the UHR criteria. Objectives To clarify the concept of ultra-high-risk individuals and to characterize the clinical and functional characteristics and general psychopathology of those individuals that do not transition to psychosis during the follow-up period. Methods Research on UpToDate using the terms "Ultra-High-Risk"; "psychosis", "transition". Results Recent literature has suggested that less than 30% of those who meet established criteria for being at Clinical-High-Risk of psychosis (CHR-P) go on to develop a psychotic illness. It is therefore of crucial importance and relevance to assess and clarify what happens to high-risk individuals who do not transition to psychosis, who make up the vast majority. One of the most recent studies (NAPLS-2) that encompassed 764 of CHR-P individuals who were followed for 2 years, concluded that 278 did not transition to psychosis during the follow-up period. Three clinical outcomes were recorded: 1 group had experienced a psychopathological remission (39.57%); the other kept symptomatic but not currently meeting criteria for a prodromal risk syndrome (33.45%); the third group had a prodromal progression (26.98%). The study concluded among others that although the remission group had improved social functioning at 2 years compared with the other groups, they were still functioning below the healthy control group. Another meta-analysis that included a total of 2756 CHR-P individuals with a mean duration of follow-up of 30.7 months evaluated several clinical outcomes in CHR-P that didn't transitioned to psychosis and between CHR-P non-transitioning versus those transitioning to psychosis. It concluded that CHR-P that do not transition to psychosis have an overall improvement of symptoms (APS, negative, depressive) and functioning at follow-up compared to baseline. Conclusions The occurrence of a first psychotic episode is often devastating for the patient and their family, especially given its usual onset in adolescence and early adulthood. This is a critical period in the individual's development as a person, and disorders at this stage can threaten the potential for a productive and inclusive adult life. Studies have suggested that less than 30% of individuals classified as UHR actually develop a psychotic disorder. However, little is known about the individuals belonging to this group who do not transition to psychosis. We therefore consider it is relevant to clarify the clinical and functional outcomes of this group of individuals. Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Attachment styles and associated psychosocial factors in patients at ultra-high risk for psychosis: A systematic review

Measuring attachment and parental bonding in psychosis and its clinical implications

Psychosocial stress, interpersonal sensitivity, and social withdrawal in clinical high risk for psychosis: a systematic review

Social Cognition in Individuals at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis: A Meta-Analysis

Ultra-High-Risk that do not transition to psychosis. What happens?

Environmental and psychopathological predictors of clinical high‐risk of psychosis in adolescence

Neurocognitive and Clinical Predictors of Long-Term Outcome in Adolescents at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis: a 6-Year Follow-Up.

Case report: From anxiety disorders to psychosis, a continuum in transitional age youth?

The relationship between insecure attachment and paranoia in psychosis: A systematic literature review

Non-psychotic Outcomes in Young People at Ultra-High Risk of Developing a Psychotic Disorder: A Long-Term Follow-up Study

Genetic liability in individuals at ultra-high risk of psychosis: A comparison study of 9 psychiatric traits

Psychopathological characteristics in ultra‐high risk for psychosis with and without comorbid ADHD

Attachment Style and Insight in Schizophrenia: a Cross-Sectional Study

Adolescents at Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis: Long-Term Outcome of Individuals Who Recover from Their At-Risk State.

Relationship between social cognition and premorbid adjustment in psychosis: a systematic review

The association between psychosocial stress, interpersonal sensitivity, social withdrawal and psychosis relapse: a systematic review

Influence of attachment on socio-psychological adaptation and its dynamics in the course of treatment in adolescent patients with schizotypal disorder

Interplay of hippocampal volume and hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis function as markers of stress vulnerability in men at ultra-high risk for psychosis

Does insecure attachment lead to psychosis via dissociation? A systematic review of the literature

Applying the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in a Case of Ultra-High Risk for Psychosis With Emotional Comorbidity

Attachment classification and early adversity predict perinatal partial hospital treatment response