What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper aims to explore the differences between firearm owners and non-owners in supporting political violence and further analyze the distinctions among different types of firearm owners. The main objectives of the study include: 1. **Assessing whether there is a difference in the level of support for political violence between firearm owners and non-owners**: The study found that firearm owners are more likely than non-owners to believe that violence is often or always justified to achieve specific political goals (adjusted difference of 6.5 percentage points, 95% CI 4.5-9.3). 2. **Analyzing the attitudes of different types of firearm owners towards political violence**: Recent firearm purchasers, those who frequently carry loaded firearms in public, and to a lesser extent, those who own assault rifles, are more supportive and willing to engage in political violence compared to other subgroups. 3. **Willingness to personally engage in political violence**: Although firearm owners are more supportive of political violence, their willingness to actually participate in political violence is not significantly higher than that of non-owners. The study also found that among all three subgroups of interest, respondents more frequently believed that in a future situation perceived as justified political violence, they would carry weapons and were more likely to openly carry weapons. Additionally, those who frequently carry loaded firearms are more likely to believe they would shoot others in such a situation. These findings help guide risk-based preventive measures.

Firearm Ownership and Support for Political Violence in the United States