Busulfan plus cyclophosphamide vs. total body irradiation plus cyclophosphamide for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with acute T lymphoblastic leukemia: a large-scale propensity score matching-based study

Yifan Shen,Minyuan Liu,Danya Shen,Mengqian Chu,Xuekai Li,Xiang Zhang,Yi Fan,Jia Chen,Depei Wu,Shaoyan Hu,Yang Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-024-02280-9
2024-04-14
Bone Marrow Transplantation
Abstract:T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) is a hematological malignancy with 5-year overall survival (OS) of less than 60% in adults and 85% in children due to improved intensive therapies [1,2,3]. Over the past few decades, allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) has been proved to improve the prognosis and even be a potential cure for T-ALL [1]. The two most common myeloablative conditioning regimens were total body irradiation (TBI) plus cyclophosphamide (TBI-Cy) and busulfan (Bu) plus cyclophosphamide (BuCy) [4]. TBI-Cy is mostly used in ALL patients as TBI possesses potent and distinct anti-leukemic effects in organs not easily affected by systemic chemotherapy [5]. However, TBI-based conditioning regimens may lead to cataracts, engraftment failure and even subsequent malignant neoplasms (SMNs) [6]. To avoid these disadvantages, intravenous Bu replaced TBI as a part of conditioning.
oncology,immunology,hematology,transplantation
What problem does this paper attempt to address?