Abstract:The electronic version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire shows excellent agreement and test–retest with the original paper version among patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia and asymptomatic controls. Future incorporation of this technological‐based tool into clinical practice presents exciting opportunities for more efficient and accessible patient assessment. Background and Aims Accurate assessment of patient‐reported oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) is essential to guide appropriate management and evaluate response. The Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ) is a paper‐based 17‐item inventory developed and validated to objectively detect risk of OPD. An easy‐to‐use electronic version with digital output has significant potential in streamlining patient assessment. This study aims to develop and validate an electronic version of the SSQ (eSSQ) against the original paper version. Method The English‐based paper SSQ was adapted on the online REDcap (Research Electronic Data Capture) platform to be accessible on computer and mobile devices. Patients with OPD and asymptomatic controls completed both electronic and paper versions in randomized order. Patients with stable symptoms then repeated the eSSQ after ≥14 days for test–retest reliability. Paper‐based and eSSQs were also collected from an independent cohort for external validation. Agreement of total scores between both versions and eSSQ test–retest reliability were calculated using two‐way mixed‐effects intra‐class correlation coefficient (ICC). Results 47 dysphagic patients, 32 controls, and 31 patients from an external validation cohort were recruited. The most common underlying etiology was head and neck cancer. Mean eSSQ total score was 789 in dysphagic patients, and 68 in controls. eSSQ had excellent agreement with paper SSQ in total scores among all participants, with ICC 0.97 (95% CI [0.93, 0.98]) in controls, 0.97 (95% CI [0.94, 0.98]) in dysphagic patients and 0.96 (95% CI [0.92, 0.98]) in validation cohort. Test–retest reliability was also excellent (ICC 0.96, 95% CI [0.90, 0.98]). Conclusion The newly developed eSSQ shows excellent agreement with the paper version and test–retest reliability. Future applications of its use may allow for more efficient and accessible patient assessment.

Validity and Reliability of Dysphagia Outcome Severity Scale (DOSS) When Used to Rate Flexible Endoscopic Evaluations of Swallowing (FEES)

Psychometric assessment and validation of the dysphagia severity rating scale in stroke patients

Validation of the Italian Version of the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS-It) Against Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing and Nutritional Status

Cross-sectional study on dysphagia evaluation in community-dwelling older adults using the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT)-10, EAT-2, and Water Swallow Test

Pharyngeal Residue Scoring in Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: Reliability Comparison and Applicability Among Different Scales

Reliability and validity of the Slovenian Translation of the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS-SI)

Psychometric Properties of Questionnaires on Functional Health Status in Oropharyngeal Dysphagia: A Systematic Literature Review

Validation of the Delirium Observation Screening Scale in long‐term care facilities in Flanders

Preliminary Normative Reference Values of Validated FEES Scales in Healthy Young Adults

Psychometric evaluation of the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire for adults and adolescents with eosinophilic esophagitis

Clinical, Patient And Service Outcomes For Patients In A Rehabilitation Hospital With An Onsite Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation Of Swallowing Service

Development and validation of an electronic version of Sydney Swallow Questionnaire

A Feasibility Study on the SWADOC Tool

Characterizing the Validity of Using VASES to Derive DIGEST-FEES Grades

Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Proposed Checklist

Development and Pilot Study of a Pediatric Screening for Feeding and Swallowing Disorders in Infants and Children: The Pediatric Screening–Priority Evaluation Dysphagia (PS–PED)

Role of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) in children with suspected dysphagia

Sensitivity and specificity of the EAT-10 and SDQ-DP in identifying the risk of dysphagia in Parkinson's disease

Validation of the Swedish Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity for Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (DIGEST-FEES)

Reliability and Construct Validity of the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale: Performance on Videos and Effect of Bolus Consistency

Screening for dysphagia in older people with dementia: Evidence of validity based on internal structure and reliability of the Caregiver Questionnaire - RaDID-QC