An Adaptive Intervention for Patients in an Online Weight Loss Program

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.14587

2024-06-08

JAMA Network Open

Abstract:This randomized clinical trial compares brief and extended coaching programs for patients in an online weight loss program who had achieved less than 4% of body weight loss at 1 month.

medicine, general & internal

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

An Adaptive Behavioral Intervention for Weight Loss Management: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Bonnie Spring,Angela F Pfammatter,Laura Scanlan,Elyse Daly,Jean Reading,Sam Battalio,H Gene McFadden,Don Hedeker,Juned Siddique,Inbal Nahum-Shani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.0821

IF: 11.816

2024-07-02

JAMA

Abstract:Importance: Lifestyle interventions for weight loss are difficult to implement in clinical practice. Self-managed mobile health implementations without or with added support after unsuccessful weight loss attempts could offer effective population-level obesity management. Objective: To test whether a wireless feedback system (WFS) yields noninferior weight loss vs WFS plus telephone coaching and whether participants who do not respond to initial treatment achieve greater weight loss with more vs less vigorous step-up interventions. Design, setting, and participants: In this noninferiority randomized trial, 400 adults aged 18 to 60 years with a body mass index of 27 to 45 were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo 3 months of treatment initially with WFS or WFS plus coaching at a US academic medical center between June 2017 and March 2021. Participants attaining suboptimal weight loss were rerandomized to undergo modest or vigorous step-up intervention. Interventions: The WFS included a Wi-Fi activity tracker and scale transmitting data to a smartphone app to provide daily feedback on progress in lifestyle change and weight loss, and WFS plus coaching added 12 weekly 10- to 15-minute supportive coaching calls delivered by bachelor's degree-level health promotionists viewing participants' self-monitoring data on a dashboard; step-up interventions included supportive messaging via mobile device screen notifications (app-based screen alerts) without or with coaching or powdered meal replacement. Participants and staff were unblinded and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment randomization. Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the between-group difference in 6-month weight change, with the noninferiority margin defined as a difference in weight change of -2.5 kg; secondary outcomes included between-group differences for all participants in weight change at 3 and 12 months and between-group 6-month weight change difference among nonresponders exposed to modest vs vigorous step-up interventions. Results: Among 400 participants (mean [SD] age, 40.5 [11.2] years; 305 [76.3%] women; 81 participants were Black and 266 were White; mean [SD] body mass index, 34.4 [4.3]) randomized to undergo WFS (n = 199) vs WFS plus coaching (n = 201), outcome data were available for 342 participants (85.5%) at 6 months. Six-month weight loss was -2.8 kg (95% CI, -3.5 to -2.0) for the WFS group and -4.8 kg (95% CI, -5.5 to -4.1) for participants in the WFS plus coaching group (difference in weight change, -2.0 kg [90% CI, -2.9 to -1.1]; P < .001); the 90% CI included the noninferiority margin of -2.5 kg. Weight change differences were comparable at 3 and 12 months and, among nonresponders, at 6 months, with no difference by step-up therapy. Conclusions and relevance: A wireless feedback system (Wi-Fi activity tracker and scale with smartphone app to provide daily feedback) was not noninferior to the same system with added coaching. Continued efforts are needed to identify strategies for weight loss management and to accurately select interventions for different individuals to achieve weight loss goals. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02997943.
Personalized Web-Based Weight Loss Behavior Change Program With and Without Dietitian Online Coaching for Adults With Overweight and Obesity: Randomized Controlled Trial

Alline Beleigoli,Andre Q Andrade,Maria De Fatima Diniz,Antonio Luiz Ribeiro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/17494

IF: 7.076

2020-11-05

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract:Background The effect of computer- or human-delivered personalized feedback on the effectivess of web-based behavior change platforms for weight loss is unclear. Objective We aimed to compare the effectiveness of a web-based behavior change intervention personalized through either computerized or human-delivered feedback with a nonpersonalized intervention in promoting weight loss in community-based adults with overweight or obesity. Methods This pragmatic, 3-group, parallel-arm, randomized trial recruited students and staff in a Brazilian public university who were aged 18 to 60 years, had a BMI of ≥25 kg/m2, and were not pregnant. Participants were allocated to one of 3 groups: platform only (24-week behavior change program delivered using a web platform with personalized computer-delivered feedback), platform plus coaching (same 24-week web-based behavior change program plus 12 weeks of personalized feedback delivered online by a dietitian), or waiting list (nonpersonalized dietary and physical activity recommendations delivered through an e-booklet and videos). Self-reported weight at 24 weeks was the primary outcome. Changes in dietary and physical activity habits within 24 weeks were secondary outcomes. Results Among the 1298 participants, 375 (28.89%) were lost to follow-up. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the platform-only and platform plus coaching groups had greater mean weight loss than the waiting-list group at 24 weeks (–1.08 kg, 95% CI –1.41 to –0.75 vs –1.57 kg, 95% CI –1.92 to –1.22 vs –0.66 kg, 95% CI –0.98 to –0.34, respectively). The platform-only and platform plus coaching groups, compared with the waiting list group, had a greater increase in the consumption of vegetables (3%, 95% CI 1% to 6% vs 5%, 95% CI 2% to 8% vs –3%, 95% CI –5% to 0%) and fruits (9%, 95% CI 6% to 12% vs 6%, 95% CI 2% to 9% vs 2%, 95% CI 0% to 6%) and a larger reduction in ultraprocessed food intake (–18%, 95% CI –23% to –13% vs –25%, 95% CI –30% to –20% vs –12%, 95% CI –16% to –8%). Changes in physical activity did not differ across the groups. Engagement was higher in the platform plus coaching group than in the platform-only group (7.6 vs 5.2 completed sessions; P=.007). Longer usage of the platform was associated with clinically meaningful (≥5%) weight loss (odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.04). Conclusions The web-based behavior change programs with computer- and human-delivered personalized feedback led to greater, albeit small-magnitude, weight loss within 24 weeks. Improvement in multiple dietary habits, but not physical activity, were also greater in the personalized programs compared with the nonpersonalized one. The human-delivered personalized feedback by the online dietitian coach increased user engagement with the program and was associated with a significantly higher chance of clinically meaningful weight loss. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03435445; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03435445 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/10.1186/s12889-018-5882-y

health care sciences & services,medical informatics
Outcomes in a digital weight management intervention with one-on-one health coaching

Jordan M Silberman,Manpreet Kaur,Jakob Sletteland,Aarathi Venkatesan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232221

IF: 3.7

2020-04-30

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Background: Some guidelines state that in-person weight management interventions are more efficacious than those delivered digitally. However, digital programs are more scalable and accessible. We hypothesized that one-on-one health coaching via app-based video chat would simulate an in-person experience and help achieve outcomes comparable to those of in-person interventions. Methods: A 12-month digital weight management intervention was provided to overweight or obese adults recruited from a large technology company. One-on-one health coaching sessions were offered during a 24-week intensive phase as well as subsequent maintenance phase. Focused on sustainable changes in activity and diet, the intervention incorporates SMART goals, in-app food and activity logs, Fitbit integration, as well as optional sleep and stress modules. Self-Determination Theory and the Transtheoretical Model are incorporated to drive behavior change. Multilevel mixed-effects models were used to analyze weight changes retrospectively. Results: Six hundred eighty-three participants reported 29,051 weights. At 12 months, mean percent changes in body weight were -7.2% and -7.6% for overweight and obese groups, respectively. A weight change of -5% is commonly targeted for in-person weight management interventions. Observed weight loss exceeded this target by 2.2% (95% CI, 0.7% to 3.8%; P < .01) for the overweight group and 2.6% (95% CI, 1.4% to 3.9%; P < .01) for the obese group. Conclusions: Further research is needed with randomization to in-person or digital interventions. Though limited by an observational, retrospective design, preliminary results suggest that some digital weight management programs with one-on-one coaching may achieve outcomes comparable to those of robust, in-person interventions.
Design of Project STAR: A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of an adaptive intervention on long-term weight-loss maintenance

Kathryn M Ross,Meena N Shankar,Peihua Qiu,Zibo Tian,Taylor N Swanson,Armaan Shetty,Jaime Ruiz,Lisa Anthony,Michael G Perri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2024.107707

Abstract:Background: Without provision of additional intervention, most individuals regain weight after the end of weight-loss programs. Extended-care programs have been demonstrated to improve long-term weight-loss maintenance, but effects are modest. Methods: We proposed to evaluate whether delivering extended-care telephone sessions on an ADAPTIVE (provided when individuals are deemed to be at high-risk for weight regain) versus STATIC (the once-per-month schedule typically used in extended-care programs) schedule improves weight regain after initial weight loss. Adults with obesity were initially recruited for a 16-week lifestyle weight-loss program, and those who lost ≥5 % of their initial weight were eligible for enrollment in the Project STAR maintenance trial. Results: A total of 449 individuals (mean ± SD age = 49.5 ± 11.4 years, BMI = 35.7 ± 4.0 kg/m2, 83.5 % female, 23.4 % Black or African American, 9.8 % Hispanic) were recruited for the initial weight-loss program and lost an average of 6.4 ± 4.9 % of their initial body weight; 255 were randomized to the maintenance trial. There were no significant differences between participants randomized to the trial versus those who were not in terms of baseline weight, gender, race/ethnicity, education, or marital status, all ps > 0.05; however, participants who were randomized to the trial were older, p = .014, and reported higher incomes, p < .001. Conclusion: Results from Project STAR will demonstrate whether providing extended-care intervention on an individually adaptable schedule improves long-term weight-loss maintenance. Moreover, the rich longitudinal dataset collected during the trial will serve as a foundation for building future predictive algorithms of weight regain and novel weight-maintenance interventions.
Effects of a Web-Based Lifestyle Intervention on Weight Loss and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Adults With Overweight and Obesity: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Jan Kohl,Judith Brame,Christoph Centner,Ramona Wurst,Reinhard Fuchs,Matthias Sehlbrede,Iris Tinsel,Phillip Maiwald,Urs Alexander Fichtner,Christoph Armbruster,Erik Farin-Glattacker,Albert Gollhofer,Daniel König

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/43426

2023-06-27

Abstract:Background: The high proportion of people with overweight and obesity has become a worldwide problem in recent decades, mainly due to health consequences, such as cardiovascular diseases, neoplasia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Regarding effective countermeasures, the digitization of health services offers numerous potentials, which, however, have not yet been sufficiently evaluated. Web-based health programs are becoming increasingly interactive and can provide individuals with effective long-term weight management support. Objective: The purpose of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of an interactive web-based weight loss program on anthropometric, cardiometabolic, and behavioral variables and to compare it with a noninteractive web-based weight loss program. Methods: The randomized controlled trial included people who were aged between 18 and 65 years (mean 48.92, SD 11.17 years) and had a BMI of 27.5 to 34.9 kg/m2 (mean 30.71, SD 2.13 kg/m2). Participants (n=153) were assigned to either (1) an interactive and fully automated web-based health program (intervention) or (2) a noninteractive web-based health program (control). The intervention program focused on dietary energy density and allowed for dietary documentation with appropriate feedback on energy density and nutrients. The control group only received information on weight loss and energy density, but the website did not contain interactive content. Examinations were performed at baseline (t0), at the end of the 12-week intervention (t1), and at 6 months (t2) and 12 months (t3) thereafter. The primary outcome was body weight. The secondary outcomes were cardiometabolic variables as well as dietary and physical activity behaviors. Robust linear mixed models were used to evaluate the primary and secondary outcomes. Results: The intervention group showed significant improvements in anthropometric variables, such as body weight (P=.004), waist circumference (P=.002), and fat mass (P=.02), compared with the control group over the course of the study. The mean weight loss after the 12-month follow-up was 4.18 kg (4.7%) in the intervention group versus 1.29 kg (1.5%) in the control group compared with the initial weight. The results of the nutritional analysis showed that the energy density concept was significantly better implemented in the intervention group. Significant differences in cardiometabolic variables were not detected between the 2 groups. Conclusions: The interactive web-based health program was effective in reducing body weight and improving body composition in adults with overweight and obesity. However, these improvements were not associated with relevant changes in cardiometabolic variables, although it should be noted that the study population was predominantly metabolically healthy. Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00020249; https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00020249. International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.3390/ijerph19031393.
Pragmatic Implementation of Online Obesity Treatment and Maintenance Interventions in Primary Care

J. Graham Thomas,Emily Panza,Carly M. Goldstein,Jacqueline F. Hayes,Noah Benedict,Kevin O’Leary,Rena R. Wing

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.8438

2024-03-11

JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract:Importance Behavioral weight loss interventions have achieved success in primary care; however, to our knowledge, pragmatic implementation of a fully automated treatment that requires little researcher oversight has not been tested. Moreover, weight loss maintenance remains a challenge. Objective To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of an automated, online, behavioral obesity treatment program (Rx Weight Loss [RxWL]) at 12 months (primary end point) and 24 months when delivered pragmatically in primary care and to compare the effectiveness of 3 weight loss maintenance approaches. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized clinical trial of RxWL, an online weight loss program, recruited patients from a Rhode Island primary care network with approximately 60 practices and 100 physicians. Eligible participants were primary care patients aged 18 to 75 years with overweight or obesity who were referred by their nurse care manager and enrolled between 2018 and 2020. All participants were included in the intention-to-treat analysis, whereas only those who engaged with maintenance intervention were included in the per-protocol analysis. Data were analyzed from August 2022 to September 2023. Interventions All participants were offered the same 3-month weight loss program, with randomization to one of three 9-month maintenance programs: control intervention (monthly online newsletters), monthly intervention (9 monthly video lessons and 1 week of self-monitoring per month), or refresher intervention (an introductory session and two 4-week periods of lessons and self-monitoring at 7 and 10 months). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was weight change at 12 months using height and weight data collected from electronic medical records through 24 months. Results Among the 540 participants (mean [SD] age, 52.8 [13.4] years; 384 females [71.1%]) in the intention-to-treat analysis, mean estimated 3-month weight loss was 3.60 (95% CI, −4.32 to −2.88) kg. At the 12-month primary end point, the amount of weight regained in the monthly (0.37 [95% CI, −0.06 to 0.81] kg) and refresher (0.45 [95% CI, 0.27 to 0.87] kg) maintenance groups was significantly less than that in the newsletter control maintenance group (1.28 [95% CI, 0.85 to 1.71] kg; P = .004). The difference in weight regain between the monthly and refresher maintenance groups was not statistically significant. This pattern persisted at 24 months. In the per-protocol analysis of 253 participants, mean weight loss at the end of the initial 3-month intervention was 6.19 (95% CI, −7.25 to −5.13) kg. Similarly, at 12 months there was less weight regain in the monthly (0.61 kg) and refresher (0.96 kg) maintenance groups than in the newsletter control maintenance group (1.86 kg). Conclusions and Relevance Results of this randomized clinical trial indicate that pragmatic implementation of a 12-month automated, online, behavioral obesity treatment that includes 9 months of active maintenance produces clinically significant weight loss over 2 years in primary care patients with overweight or obesity. These findings underscore the importance of providing ongoing maintenance intervention to prevent weight regain. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03488212

medicine, general & internal
Testing the short-term effectiveness of primary care referral to online weight loss programmes: A randomised controlled trial

Michaela Noreik,Claire D Madigan,Nerys M Astbury,Rhiannon M Edwards,Ushma Galal,Jill Mollison,Fitsum Ghebretinsea,Susan A Jebb

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12482

Abstract:Guidelines ask health professionals to offer brief advice to encourage weight loss for people living with obesity. We tested whether referral to one of three online programmes could lead to successful weight loss. A total of 528 participants aged ≥18 years with a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2 were invited via a letter from their GP. Participants were randomised to one of three online weight loss programmes (NHS Weight Loss Plan, Rosemary Online or Slimming World Online) or to a control group receiving no intervention. Participants self-reported weight at baseline and 8 weeks. The primary outcome was weight change in each of the active intervention groups compared with control. We also compared the proportion of participants losing ≥5% or ≥10% of body weight. For Rosemary, Online mean weight loss was modestly greater than control (-1.5 kg [95% confidence interval (CI) -2.3 to -0.6]) and more than three times as many participants in this group lost ≥5% (relative risk [RR] = 3.64, 95% CI: 1.63-8.1). For Slimming World, mean weight loss was not significantly different from control (-0.8 kg [95%CI -1.7 to 0.1]), twice as many participants lost ≥5% (RR = 2.70, 1.17-6.23). There was no significant difference in weight loss for participants using the NHS Weight Loss Plan (-0.4 kg, [95% CI -1.3 to 0.5]), or the proportion losing ≥5% (RR = 2.09, 0.87-5.01). Only one of three online weight loss programmes was superior to no intervention and the effect size modest among participants living with obesity.
Protocol for Partner2Lose: A randomized controlled trial to evaluate partner involvement on long-term weight loss

Corrine I Voils,Ryan Shaw,Rachel Adler,Elizabeth Jeanes,Megan A Lewis,Whitney Sharp,Kate A Cronin,Scott Hetzel,Lu Mao,Heather M Johnson,Felix Elwert,Samantha Pabich,Kara L Gavin,William S Yancy Jr,Laura S Porter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2020.106092

Abstract:Background: Behavioral interventions produce clinically significant weight reduction, with many participants regaining weight subsequently. Most interventions focus on an individual, but dietary and physical activity behaviors occur with, or are influenced by, domestic partners. According to interdependence theory, couples who approach behavior change as a problem to be tackled together versus independently are more likely to utilize communal coping processes to promote behavior change. We utilized interdependence theory to develop a partner-assisted intervention to increase long-term weight loss. Methods: Community-dwelling individuals (index participants) cohabitating with a partner with 1) overweight and at least one obesity-related comorbidity or 2) obesity are randomized to participate in a standard weight management program alone or with their partner. The weight management program involves biweekly, in-person, group sessions focusing on weight loss for six months, followed by three group sessions and nine telephone calls focusing on weight loss maintenance for twelve months. In the partner-assisted arm, partners participate in half of the group sessions and telephone calls. Couples receive training in principles of cognitive behavioral therapy for couples, including sharing thoughts and feelings and joint problem solving, to increase communal coping. The primary outcome is participant weight loss at 24 months, with caloric intake and moderate-intensity physical activity as secondary outcomes. Partner weight and caloric intake will also be analyzed. Mediation analyses will examine the role of interdependence variables and social support. Discussion: This trial will provide knowledge about effective ways to promote long-term weight loss and the role of interdependence constructs in weight loss. Clinical trials identifier: NCT03801174.
Effectiveness of active-online, an individually tailored physical activity intervention, in a real-life setting: randomized controlled trial

Miriam Wanner,Eva Martin-Diener,Charlotte Braun-Fahrländer,Georg Bauer,Brian W Martin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1179

2009-07-28

Abstract:Background: Effective interventions are needed to reduce the chronic disease epidemic. The Internet has the potential to provide large populations with individual advice at relatively low cost. Objective: The focus of the study was the Web-based tailored physical activity intervention Active-online. The main research questions were (1) How effective is Active-online, compared to a nontailored website, in increasing self-reported and objectively measured physical activity levels in the general population when delivered in a real-life setting? (2) Do respondents recruited for the randomized study differ from spontaneous users of Active-online, and how does effectiveness differ between these groups? (3) What is the impact of frequency and duration of use of Active-online on changes in physical activity behavior? Methods: Volunteers recruited via different media channels completed a Web-based baseline survey and were randomized to Active-online (intervention group) or a nontailored website (control group). In addition, spontaneous users were recruited directly from the Active-online website. In a subgroup of participants, physical activity was measured objectively using accelerometers. Follow-up assessments took place 6 weeks (FU1), 6 months (FU2), and 13 months (FU3) after baseline. Results: A total of 1531 respondents completed the baseline questionnaire (intervention group n = 681, control group n = 688, spontaneous users n = 162); 133 individuals had valid accelerometer data at baseline. Mean age of the total sample was 43.7 years, and 1146 (74.9%) were women. Mixed linear models (adjusted for sex, age, BMI category, and stage of change) showed a significant increase in self-reported mean minutes spent in moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity from baseline to FU1 (coefficient = 0.14, P = .001) and to FU3 (coefficient = 0.19, P < .001) in all participants with no significant differences between groups. A significant increase in the proportion of individuals meeting the HEPA recommendations (self-reported) was observed in all participants between baseline and FU3 (OR = 1.47, P = .03), with a higher increase in spontaneous users compared to the randomized groups (interaction between FU3 and spontaneous users, OR = 2.95, P = .02). There were no increases in physical activity over time in any group for objectively measured physical activity. A significant relation was found between time spent on the tailored intervention and changes in self-reported physical activity between baseline and FU3 (coefficient = 1.13, P = .03, intervention group and spontaneous users combined). However, this association was no longer significant when adjusting for stage of change. Conclusions: In a real-life setting, Active-online was not more effective than a nontailored website in increasing physical activity levels in volunteers from the general population. Further research may investigate ways of integrating Web-based physical activity interventions in a wider context, for example, primary care or workplace health promotion.
Effect of a Remotely Delivered Self-directed Behavioral Intervention on Body Weight and Physical Health Status Among Adults With Obesity: The D-ELITE Randomized Clinical Trial

Katherine D Hoerster,Rachel Hunter-Merrill,Tanya Nguyen,Peter Rise,Anna E Barón,Jennifer McDowell,Lucas M Donovan,Emily Gleason,Amber Lane,Robert Plumley,Mary Schooler,Linnaea Schuttner,Margaret Collins,David H Au,Jun Ma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.21177

IF: 11.816

2022-12-13

JAMA

Abstract:Importance: The effectiveness of remotely delivered, self-directed, weight loss programs in routine clinical practice is largely unknown. Objective: To test whether a self-directed, remotely administered behavioral lifestyle intervention improves weight and self-reported general health status compared with usual care. Design, setting, and participants: In this randomized clinical trial, 511 adults with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or more and less than 45 (based on electronic health record [EHR] weight and height), were enrolled from 30 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) sites between February 15, 2018, and December 18, 2018 (final follow-up February 18, 2021). Interventions: Participants were randomly assigned to the intervention group (n = 254) or the control group (n = 257). Both received usual care. Participants randomized to the intervention received Diabetes Prevention Program-based self-directed videos, handouts, and coaching messages via an online platform or US mail for 12 months. Main outcomes and measures: Coprimary outcomes were weight measured in primary care and recorded in the EHR and self-reported general health status using the Medical Outcomes Study 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) physical component score (PCS; higher scores are better [range, 0-100]) at the 12-month follow-up. The between-group minimal clinically important differences are 3 kg for weight and 5 points for the SF-12 PCS. Linear mixed models used weights and SF-12 PCS measured at either time point, with participants analyzed according to randomization assignment. Statistical significance for each coprimary outcome was based on a 2-sided α level of .025. Results: Among 511 participants randomized (mean age, 57.4 [SD, 13.9] years; 231 female [45%]), 429 (84.0%) had EHR-based weights and 410 (80.2%) had SF-12 PCS data at 12 months. The unadjusted mean weight at 12 months declined from 102.7 kg to 99.8 kg in the intervention group compared with 101.9 kg to 101.0 kg in the control group (adjusted between-group mean difference, -1.93 [97.5% CI, -3.24 to -0.61]; P = .001). At 12 months, the unadjusted mean SF-12 PCS scores declined from 44.8 to 44.3 among intervention participants compared with 44.5 to 43.2 among control participants (adjusted between-group mean difference, intervention minus control, 0.69 [97.5% CI, -1.11 to 2.49]; P = .39). Cardiovascular events represented the highest percentage of serious adverse events, accounting for 25% of events in the intervention group and 35% in the control group. Conclusions and relevance: Among adults with obesity, a remotely delivered self-directed, behavioral lifestyle intervention, compared with usual care, resulted in statistically significantly greater weight loss at 12 months, although the difference was not clinically important. There was no significant difference in self-reported general physical health status at 12 months. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03260140.
An addiction‐based digital weight loss intervention: A multi‐centre randomized controlled trial

Alaina P. Vidmar,Sarah J. Salvy,Choo Phei Wee,Robert Pretlow,D. Steven Fox,Jennifer K. Yee,Cambria Garell,Suzette Glasner,Steven D. Mittelman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.12990

2022-12-11

Pediatric Obesity

Abstract:Summary Objective This randomized clinical trial tested the effectiveness of an addiction‐based digital weight‐loss intervention, focusing on withdrawal/abstinence from self‐identified problem foods, snacking and excessive amounts at meals, and discomfort displacement, with and without coaching, compared to an in‐person, multi‐disciplinary, care model among adolescents with obesity. We hypothesized that the digital intervention with coaching would yield greater weight loss and lower delivery burden than the standard clinical arm, and greater participant engagement than the digital arm without coaching. Methods Adolescents were randomized to app intervention, with or without coaching, or in‐person multidisciplinary obesity intervention for 6 months. The primary outcome was change in %BMIp95 at weeks 12 and 24. A mixed‐effects linear regression model was used to assess the association between change in %BMIp95 and intervention arm. We were also interested in assessing delivery burden, participant engagement and evaluating the relationships between weight change and demographic characteristics, mood, executive function and eating behaviours. Results All adolescents (n = 161; BMI ≥95th%, age 16 ± 2.5 year; 47% Hispanic, 65% female, 59% publicly insured) lost weight over 24‐weeks (−1.29%, [−1.82, −0.76], p

pediatrics
Randomized controlled trial of OnTrack, a just-in-time adaptive intervention designed to enhance weight loss.

M. Butryn,F. Zhang,A. Juarascio,E. Forman,G. Foster,S. Goldstein,Rebecca J. Crochiere

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz137

2019-11-25

Translational Behavioral Medicine

Abstract:Individual instances of nonadherence to reduced calorie dietary prescriptions, that is, dietary lapses, represent a key challenge for weight management. Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs), which collect and analyze data in real time to deliver tailored interventions during moments of need, may be well suited to promote weight loss by preventing dietary lapses. We developed OnTrack (OT), a smartphone application (app) that collects data on lapses and triggers of lapse, uses a continuously improving machine learning model to predict lapse risk, and delivers tailored interventions when risk is elevated. The current study evaluated the efficacy of OT against an active control in facilitating weight loss. Participants (N = 181) with overweight/obesity (MBMI = 34.32; 85.1% female; 73.5% White) were randomized to receive either the WW (formerly Weight Watchers) Beyond the Scale (BTS) digital program alone or WW plus OnTrack (WW + OT) for 10 weeks. In an unplanned, natural experiment, the WW program changed mid-way through the trial from BTS to a more flexible one, Freestyle (FS). A general linear model revealed a treatment condition × diet plan interaction (F[1, 173] = 9.68, p = .002) such that OT demonstrated greater efficacy only among those receiving BTS (weight loss MWW + OT = 4.7%, standard error [SE] = .55 versus MWW = 2.6%, SE = .80). Compared to FS, BTS WW + OT participants also reported considerably higher satisfaction with the intervention, engagement was higher, and algorithm accuracy was superior. Overall, results offer qualified support for OT and generally for machine learning-powered JITAIs that facilitate weight loss by predicting and preventing dietary lapses.

Medicine
Design and implementation of a randomized controlled social and mobile weight loss trial for young adults (project SMART)

K Patrick,S J Marshall,E P Davila,J K Kolodziejczyk,J H Fowler,K J Calfas,J S Huang,C L Rock,W G Griswold,A Gupta,G Merchant,G J Norman,F Raab,M C Donohue,B J Fogg,T N Robinson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2013.11.001

Abstract:Purpose: To describe the theoretical rationale, intervention design, and clinical trial of a two-year weight control intervention for young adults deployed via social and mobile media. Methods: A total of 404 overweight or obese college students from three Southern California universities (M(age) = 22( ± 4) years; M(BMI) = 29( ± 2.8); 70% female) were randomized to participate in the intervention or to receive an informational web-based weight loss program. The intervention is based on behavioral theory and integrates intervention elements across multiple touch points, including Facebook, text messaging, smartphone applications, blogs, and e-mail. Participants are encouraged to seek social support among their friends, self-monitor their weight weekly, post their health behaviors on Facebook, and e-mail their weight loss questions/concerns to a health coach. The intervention is adaptive because new theory-driven and iteratively tailored intervention elements are developed and released over the course of the two-year intervention in response to patterns of use and user feedback. Measures of body mass index, waist circumference, diet, physical activity, sedentary behavior, weight management practices, smoking, alcohol, sleep, body image, self-esteem, and depression occur at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Currently, all participants have been recruited, and all are in the final year of the trial. Conclusion: Theory-driven, evidence-based strategies for physical activity, sedentary behavior, and dietary intake can be embedded in an intervention using social and mobile technologies to promote healthy weight-related behaviors in young adults.
Describing Transitions in Adherence to Physical Activity Self-monitoring and Goal Attainment in an Online Behavioral Weight Loss Program: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Melissa L Stansbury,Jean Harvey,Rebecca A Krukowski,Christine A Pellegrini,Xuewen Wang,Delia Smith West

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/30673

IF: 7.076

2022-01-28

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract:Background Standard behavioral weight loss interventions often set uniform physical activity (PA) goals and promote PA self-monitoring; however, adherence remains a challenge, and recommendations may not accommodate all individuals. Identifying patterns of PA goal attainment and self-monitoring behavior will offer a deeper understanding of how individuals adhere to different types of commonly prescribed PA recommendations (ie, minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA] and daily steps) and guide future recommendations for improved intervention effectiveness. Objective This study examined weekly patterns of adherence to step-based and minute-based PA goals and self-monitoring behavior during a 6-month online behavioral weight loss intervention. Methods Participants were prescribed weekly PA goals for steps (7000-10,000 steps/day) and minutes of MVPA (50-200 minutes/week) as part of a lifestyle program. Goals gradually increased during the initial 2 months, followed by 4 months of fixed goals. PA was self-reported daily on the study website. For each week, participants were categorized as adherent if they self-monitored their PA and met the program PA goal, suboptimally adherent if they self-monitored but did not meet the program goal, or nonadherent if they did not self-monitor. The probability of transitioning into a less adherent status was examined using multinomial logistic regression. Results Participants (N=212) were predominantly middle-aged females with obesity, and 67 (31.6%) self-identified as a racial/ethnic minority. Initially, 73 (34.4%) participants were categorized as adherent to step-based goals, with 110 [51.9%] suboptimally adherent and 29 [13.7%] nonadherent, and there was a high probability of either remaining suboptimally adherent from week to week or transitioning to a nonadherent status. However, 149 (70.3%) participants started out adherent to minute-based goals (34 [16%] suboptimally adherent and 29 [13.7%] nonadherent), with suboptimally adherent seen as the most variable status. During the graded goal phase, participants were more likely to transition to a less adherent status for minute-based goals (odds ratio [OR] 1.39, 95% CI 1.31-1.48) compared to step-based goals (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.17-1.30); however, no differences were seen during the fixed goal phase (minute-based goals: OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.05-1.08; step-based goals: OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05-1.08). Conclusions States of vulnerability to poor PA adherence can emerge rapidly and early in obesity treatment. There is a window of opportunity within the initial 2 months to bring more people toward adherent behavior, especially those who fail to meet the prescribed goals but engage in self-monitoring. Although this study describes the probability of adhering to step- and minute-based targets, it will be prudent to determine how individual characteristics and contextual states relate to these behavioral patterns, which can inform how best to adapt interventions. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02688621; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02688621

health care sciences & services,medical informatics
Impact of a Health Coach-Led, Text-Based Digital Behavior Change Intervention on Weight Loss and Psychological Well-Being in Patients Receiving a Procedureless Intragastric Balloon Program: Prospective Single-Arm Study

Paul M Sacher,Emily Fulton,Victoria Rogers,Julia Wilson,Marco Gramatica,Jennifer E Dent,Edo O Aarts,David Eccleston,Jan Willem Greve,Inge Palm-Meinders,Ram Chuttani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/54723

2024-07-31

Abstract:Background: Digital health interventions show promise for weight management. However, few text-based behavior change interventions have been designed to support patients receiving intragastric balloons, and none have simultaneously evaluated weight loss, psychological well-being, and behavior change despite the crucial interplay of these factors in weight management. Objective: This study aims to assess whether a health coach-led, asynchronous, text-based digital behavior change coaching intervention (DBCCI) delivered to participants receiving an intragastric balloon and its aftercare program was feasible and acceptable to participants and supported improved outcomes, including weight loss, psychological well-being, and lifestyle behavior change conducive to weight loss maintenance. Methods: This 12-month, single-arm prospective study enrolled adults aged 21 to 65 years with BMI ≥27 kg/m2 receiving a procedureless intragastric balloon (PIGB) at 5 bariatric clinics in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Participants received the DBCCI and the clinic-led PIGB aftercare program (remotely delivered) for 6 months after PIGB placement and then no intervention for an additional 6 months. The DBCCI was an evidence-based, personalized intervention wherein health coaches supported participants via exchanged asynchronous in-app text-based messages. Over the 12-month study, we assessed percentage of total body weight loss and psychological well-being via self-administered validated questionnaires (Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite-Clinical Trials Version, Loss of Control Over Eating Scale-Brief, Weight Efficacy Lifestyle Questionnaire-Short Form, and Barriers to Being Active Quiz). Participant engagement with and acceptability of the intervention were assessed via self-reported surveys. Results: Overall, 107 participants (n=96, 89.7% female; mean baseline BMI 35.4, SD 5.4 kg/m2) were included in the analysis. Mean total body weight loss was 13.5% (SEM 2.3%) at the end of the DBCCI and 11.22% (SEM 2.3%) at the 12-month follow-up (P<.001). Improvements were observed for all psychological well-being measures throughout the 12 months except for the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (improvement at month 1) and Barriers to Being Active Quiz (improvements at months 3 and 6). Surveys showed high levels of engagement with and acceptability of the DBCCI. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that the health coach-led, asynchronous, text-based DBCCI was engaging and acceptable to participants with overweight and obesity. The DBCCI, delivered alongside the PIGB and its aftercare program, supported improved weight loss outcomes and psychological well-being versus baseline and was associated with lifestyle behavior changes known to help achieve and maintain long-term weight loss and improved health outcomes. Follow-up findings suggest a potential need for longer-term, more intense coaching to focus on weight loss maintenance and support ongoing self-coaching. This could be achieved by leveraging generative artificial intelligence to provide ongoing automated behavior change coaching support to augment human-led care. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05884606; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05884606.
A low-burden, self-weighing intervention to prevent weight gain in adults with obesity who do not enroll in comprehensive treatment

Megan A McVay,Montserrat Carrera Seoane,Melinda Rajoria,Marissa Dye,Natalie Marshall,Sofia Muenyi,Anas Alkanderi,Kellie B Scotti,Jaime Ruiz,Corrine I Voils,Kathryn M Ross

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.745

2024-03-20

Abstract:Background: For individuals who are eligible but unlikely to join comprehensive weight loss programs, a low burden self-weighing intervention may be a more acceptable approach to weight management. Methods: This was a single-arm feasibility trial of a 12-month self-weighing intervention. Participants were healthcare patients with a BMI ≥25 kg/m2 with a weight-related comorbidity or a BMI >30 kg/m2 who reported lack of interest in joining a comprehensive weight loss program, or did not enroll in a comprehensive program after being provided program information. In the self-weighing intervention, participants were asked to weigh themselves daily on a cellular connected scale and were sent text messages every other week with tailored weight change feedback, including messages encouraging use of comprehensive programs if weight gain occurred. Results: Of 86 eligible patients, 39 enrolled (45.3%) in the self-weighing intervention. Self-weighing occurred on average 4.6 days/week (SD = 1.4). At 12 months, 12 participants (30.8%) lost ≥3% baseline weight, 11 (28.2%) experienced weight stability (±3% baseline), 6 (15.4%) gained ≥3% of baseline weight, and 10 (25.6%) did not have available weight data to evaluate. Three participants reported joining a weight loss program during the intervention (7.7%). Participants reported high intervention satisfaction in quantitative ratings (4.1 of 5), and qualitative interviews identified areas of satisfaction (e.g., timing and content of text messages) and areas for improvement (e.g., increasing personalization of text messages). Conclusion: A low-burden self-weighing intervention can reach adults with overweight/obesity who would be unlikely to engage in comprehensive weight loss programs; the efficacy of this intervention for preventing weight gain should be further evaluated in a randomized trial.
LEAD BY EXAMPLE: Evaluation of an NCCN and ASCO guideline-based virtual weight loss and healthy lifestyle intervention on providers and staff members at a comprehensive cancer center.

Damien Mikael Hansra,Jacqueline Boodhoo,Anya Warren,Shanetia Avinger,Eyal Meiri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2022.40.16_suppl.e24045

IF: 45.3

2022-06-01

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:e24045 Background: Obesity is a leading cause of preventable death in the United States. The incidence of most obesity associated malignancies are increasing. Novel interventions to combat the obesity epidemic are greatly needed. Here we investigate the effect of a virtual clinical intervention on medical providers & other medical staff at a comprehensive cancer center. Methods: Physicians (MD), nurses (RN), & other medical staff (MS) were enrolled in an IRB approved, prospective single arm clinical trial. We assessed the effect of NCCN & ASCO guideline recommendations for weight loss & healthy lifestyle on overweight (OW) & obese (OB) providers & medical staff. Primary outcome: to assess change in body mass index (BMI) over a 3-month (mo.) intervention. Secondary outcomes: To assess changes in nutrition and exercise habits over time b) evaluate other lifestyle factors over time: stress, self-image, barriers to weight loss. Participants (Pts) filled out two 16 question (Q) pre & post survey (at 1, 90 days) relating to study outcomes. The virtual intervention consisted of giving information & advice over 3 months: A comprehensive handout e-mailed on day 1 + Motivational/info e-mails q 2 weeks/3 mo. Statistical analysis: students' paired T test used to compare changes in weight & survey responses day 0-90. P- value α = 0.05. Inclusions: age > 18 yo males & females, MD, RN, ARNP, & MS who are OW (BMI > 25Kg/m2) or OB (BMI > 30Kg/m2). Exclusions: non-OW/OB, Pts with uncontrolled cardiovascular, pulmonary, orthopedic, or cerebrovascular disease, pregnancy. Results: 106 participants enrolled; 26 subjects completed study. Demographics: 6/26 = 23% (MD/ARNP), 12/26 = 46% (RN), 8/26 = 31% (MS). 4/26 = 15% male, 22/26 = 85% female, μ age 45 (25-67). 3/26 = 12% Asian, 5/26 = 19% Black, 18/26 = 69% White. 100% not Hispanic. μ BMI = 33.9 kg/m2 (25.1-44.5). Intervention: 26/26 (100%) Pts lost weight/3 mo., μ Δ kg = -5.2kg (p < 0.0001), μ Δ BMI = - 1.67 kg/m2 (p = 0.002). Survey results: Significant improvements were seen in: self-image (p = 0.0012), physical activity (p < 0.0001), healthy diet (p < 0.0001), days/week exercise (p = 0.0008), μ Δ minutes exercise/week = +65 min/week (p = 0.0046), decreased stress levels (p < 0.0001). Limitations: significant participant drop out seen. Conclusions: All participants who completed the study lost weight & improved healthy lifestyle parameters. To our knowledge this is the first all virtual clinical weight loss & lifestyle intervention executed. Also, this is the first weight loss & lifestyle intervention executed in providers. Our intervention was cost effective, easy to execute, & warrants further study in both medical staff & patient populations. Last, this novel virtual intervention is highly relevant during the covid 19 pandemic due to social distancing requirements.

oncology
A preliminary trial of an online dissonance-based eating disorder intervention

M A Green,A Kroska,A Herrick,B Bryant,E Sage,L Miles,M Ravet,M Powers,W Whitegoat,R Linkhart,B King

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2018.08.007

Abstract:Objective: We conducted a controlled randomized preliminary trial of an expanded online version of the Body Project (n = 46) compared to an assessment-only control condition (n = 36) via a longitudinal design (baseline, postintervention, 2-month follow-up) in a community sample of women (N = 82) with clinical (n = 53) and subclinical (n = 29) eating disorder symptoms. Method: The traditional content of the Body Project was modified to include verbal, written, and behavioral exercises designed to dissuade objectification and maladaptive social comparison and adapted to an online format. Body dissatisfaction, self-esteem, self-objectification, thin-ideal internalization, maladaptive social comparison, trait anxiety, positive affect, negative affect, and eating disorder symptomatology were evaluated in the control and the online expanded Body Project condition at baseline, postintervention, and 2-month follow-up. Results: A 2 (condition: online expanded Body Project, control) × 3 (time: baseline, postintervention, 2-month follow-up) mixed factorial multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted to examine statistically significant group differences. As predicted, results indicated a statistically significant condition × time interaction. Conclusions: Participants in the expanded online Body Project condition showed significant reductions in eating disorder symptoms and several associated psychological risk correlates from baseline to postintervention and follow-up; contrary to predictions, eating disorder symptoms and risk correlates were not significantly lower in the online expanded Body Project condition compared to the waitlist control condition at postintervention or 2-month follow-up.
Optimising a digitally delivered behavioural weight loss programme: study protocol for a factorial cluster randomised controlled trial

Gina M. Wren,Dimitrios A. Koutoukidis,Jadine Scragg,Grace Preston,Marianne Hennessy,Daisy Estephane,Michael Whitman,Susan A. Jebb

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08320-5

IF: 2.728

2024-07-15

Trials

Abstract:Digitally delivered weight loss programmes can provide a convenient, potentially cheaper, and scalable treatment option for people who may need to lose weight. However, outcomes are often inferior to in-person interventions in the long-term. This trial will use principles from the Multiphase Optimisation Strategy (MOST) framework to test whether it can enhance the effectiveness of a commercial digital behavioural weight loss programme. This trial aims to identify an optimised combination of four intervention components to enhance weight loss over a 24-week period. We will also explore which components contribute to improvements in participant retention and engagement with the programme.

medicine, research & experimental
Do monthly coaching calls influence proximal participant adherence in a behavioral weight loss program?

Meghan L. Butryn,Stephanie Kerrigan,Charlotte J. Hagerman,Nicole T. Crane,Kathryn Godfrey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-023-00394-x

2023-02-02

Journal of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract:Participants who receive continued coach contact following behavioral weight loss treatment are more successful in maintaining their weight loss long-term. The current study examines whether these contacts have dynamic effects, such that participants are most adherent to the prescribed weight loss behaviors in the days after the call, when motivation and goal salience may be heightened, than they are as time goes on. The current study examined the trajectory of calorie intake, physical activity, weight, and self-monitoring behavior in the fourteen days after a monthly coaching call among participants completing the maintenance phase of a behavioral weight loss trial. For physical activity outcomes, caloric intake, and weight, there were no changes across time. Participants did have the highest adherence and quality of dietary self-monitoring immediately after the call, which diminished over time. Coach contact may continually renew commitment to this burdensome but critical behavior. Likelihood of self-weighing showed an opposite trend, where participants were more likely to weigh themselves in the days more distal from the coach call. Results can inform the timing and content of future coach contact to promote weight control.

psychology, clinical

An Adaptive Intervention for Patients in an Online Weight Loss Program

An Adaptive Behavioral Intervention for Weight Loss Management: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Personalized Web-Based Weight Loss Behavior Change Program With and Without Dietitian Online Coaching for Adults With Overweight and Obesity: Randomized Controlled Trial

Outcomes in a digital weight management intervention with one-on-one health coaching

Design of Project STAR: A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of an adaptive intervention on long-term weight-loss maintenance

Effects of a Web-Based Lifestyle Intervention on Weight Loss and Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Adults With Overweight and Obesity: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Pragmatic Implementation of Online Obesity Treatment and Maintenance Interventions in Primary Care

Testing the short-term effectiveness of primary care referral to online weight loss programmes: A randomised controlled trial

Protocol for Partner2Lose: A randomized controlled trial to evaluate partner involvement on long-term weight loss

Effectiveness of active-online, an individually tailored physical activity intervention, in a real-life setting: randomized controlled trial

Effect of a Remotely Delivered Self-directed Behavioral Intervention on Body Weight and Physical Health Status Among Adults With Obesity: The D-ELITE Randomized Clinical Trial

An addiction‐based digital weight loss intervention: A multi‐centre randomized controlled trial

Randomized controlled trial of OnTrack, a just-in-time adaptive intervention designed to enhance weight loss.

Design and implementation of a randomized controlled social and mobile weight loss trial for young adults (project SMART)

Describing Transitions in Adherence to Physical Activity Self-monitoring and Goal Attainment in an Online Behavioral Weight Loss Program: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Impact of a Health Coach-Led, Text-Based Digital Behavior Change Intervention on Weight Loss and Psychological Well-Being in Patients Receiving a Procedureless Intragastric Balloon Program: Prospective Single-Arm Study

A low-burden, self-weighing intervention to prevent weight gain in adults with obesity who do not enroll in comprehensive treatment

LEAD BY EXAMPLE: Evaluation of an NCCN and ASCO guideline-based virtual weight loss and healthy lifestyle intervention on providers and staff members at a comprehensive cancer center.

A preliminary trial of an online dissonance-based eating disorder intervention

Optimising a digitally delivered behavioural weight loss programme: study protocol for a factorial cluster randomised controlled trial

Do monthly coaching calls influence proximal participant adherence in a behavioral weight loss program?