Analysis of modified ilib therapy in patients submitted to plastic surgery

Patrícia Froes Meyer,Rafaella Rêgo Maia,Eneida de Morais Carreiro,Rodrigo Marcel Valentim da Silva,Stephany Luanna Queiroga Farias,Felice Picariello,Carla Érica Lima Medeiros,Danielli Malta Prata e Silva,Daniela Silva Salgado Barros,Vanessa Siqueira Roque,Lucas Peres de Sousa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-024-04057-4
2024-04-23
Lasers in Medical Science
Abstract:The sample comprised 44 volunteers who had undergone some surgical procedure and were equally divided into four groups. G1 started the therapy 24 h after the surgical procedure with the device off. G2 followed the same time pattern, 24 h, but with the device turned on. G3 and G4 started therapy three days after the surgical procedure; in G3, the device was turned off, and in G4, the device remained on during therapy; each session lasted 30 min, using 660 nm (red), energy 180 J. For all groups, the therapy started with daily use for seven days and followed the interval use of three times a week until completed 21 days. The revaluation was performed after 7 and 21 days. The results found show changes in HR at rest, systolic and diastolic BP, and in peripheral oxygen saturation, which showed a significant difference in the groups that used on-therapy ( p < 0.05). In the MCGILL Scale evaluation, the mean total score showed a more accentuated drop in the groups that used ILIB, ( p < 0.05). ILIB may have prevented a more significant evolution of firosis levels; however, no changes were observed in the evaluation of sleep and anxiety. The application of the ILIB in patients undergoing plastic surgery was supported in terms of hemodynamics and pain; in addition, starting the ILIB application 24 h after the procedure proved to be more advantageous.
engineering, biomedical,surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?