Delirium is frequently underdiagnosed among older hospitalised patients despite available information in hospital medical records

Irit Titlestad,Kristoffer Haugarvoll,Stein-Erik H Solvang,Tone Merete Norekvål,Ragnhild E Skogseth,Ole A Andreassen,Dag Årsland,Bjørn Erik Neerland,Jan Erik Nordrehaug,Grethe S Tell,Lasse M Giil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae006

2024-02-01

Age and Ageing

Abstract:Abstract Background In-hospital delirium is associated with adverse outcomes and is underdiagnosed, limiting research and clinical follow-up. Objective To compare the incidence of in-hospital delirium determined by chart-based review of electronic medical records (D-CBR) with delirium discharge diagnoses (D-DD). Furthermore, to identify differences in symptoms, treatments and delirium triggers between D-CBR and D-DD. Method The community-based cohort included 2,115 participants in the Hordaland Health Study born between 1925 and 1927. Between 2018 and 2022, we retrospectively reviewed hospital electronic medical records from baseline (1997–99) until death prior to 2023. D-DD and D-CBR were validated using The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria for delirium. Results Of the 2,115 participants, 638 had in-hospital delirium. The incidence rate (IR) of D-CBR was 29.8 [95% confidence interval 28, 32] per 1,000 person-years, whereas the IR by D-DD was 3.4 [2.8, 4.2]. The IR ratio was 9.14 (P < 0.001). Patients who received pharmacological treatment for delirium (n = 121, odds ratio (OR) 3.4, [2.1, 5.4], P < 0.001), who were affected by acute memory impairment (n = 149, OR 2.8, [1.8, 4.5], P < 0.001), or change in perception (n = 137, OR 2.9, [1.8, 4.6] P < 0.001) had higher odds for D-DD. In contrast, post-operative cases (OR 0.2, [0.1, 0.4], P < 0.001) had lower odds for D-DD. Conclusion Underdiagnosis of in-hospital delirium was a major issue in our study, especially in less severe delirium cases. Our findings emphasise the need for integrating systematic delirium diagnostics and documentation into hospital admission and discharge routines.

geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the under - diagnosis of delirium in elderly patients in hospitals. Specifically, the study aims to compare the incidence of in - hospital delirium determined by electronic medical record review (D - CBR) with the incidence of delirium reported in discharge diagnoses (D - DD), and further identify the differences between D - CBR and D - DD in terms of symptoms, treatment, and delirium triggers.

### Research Background
Delirium in hospitals is associated with adverse outcomes but is often under - diagnosed, which limits subsequent research and clinical follow - up. The research team hopes to more accurately assess the incidence of delirium by systematically reviewing electronic medical records and explore the differences between different diagnostic methods.

### Research Objectives
1. **Compare the incidences of D - CBR and D - DD**: Compare the incidence of in - hospital delirium determined by reviewing electronic medical record reviews (D - CBR) with the incidence of delirium reported in discharge diagnoses (D - DD).
2. **Identify the differences between D - CBR and D - DD**: Analyze the differences between D - CBR and D - DD in terms of symptoms, treatment, and delirium triggers.

### Methods
- **Research Subjects**: The study is based on a community - based cohort, including 2,115 participants who were born between 1925 and 1927 and participated in the Hordaland Health Study from 1997 to 1999.
- **Data Collection**: Reviewed the electronic medical records of Haukeland University Hospital and Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital from 1997 to 2022.
- **Diagnostic Criteria**: Used the criteria of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM - 5) to verify delirium cases.

### Results
- **Incidence of Delirium**: The incidence rate of D - CBR was 29.8 cases per 1,000 person - years (95% confidence interval: 28, 32), while the incidence rate of D - DD was 3.4 cases per 1,000 person - years (95% confidence interval: 2.8, 4.2). The incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 9.14 (P < 0.001).
- **Differences in Symptoms and Treatment**: Delirium patients who received drug treatment (n = 121, OR 3.4, 95% confidence interval: 2.1, 5.4, P < 0.001), those with acute memory impairment (n = 149, OR 2.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.8, 4.5, P < 0.001), or those with perceptual changes (n = 137, OR 2.9, 95% confidence interval: 1.8, 4.6, P < 0.001) were more likely to be recorded as D - DD. Conversely, patients with postoperative delirium (OR 0.2, 95% confidence interval: 0.1, 0.4, P < 0.001) were less likely to be recorded as D - DD.

### Conclusions
- **Under - Diagnosis**: The study found that the diagnosis of in - hospital delirium is severely under - diagnosed, especially in milder delirium cases.
- **Clinical Impact**: Under - diagnosis and under - recording may have an adverse impact on clinical follow - up and delirium research.
- **Recommendations**: There is a need to integrate systematic delirium diagnosis and recording in hospitalization and discharge routines.

### Key Points
- The diagnosis of in - hospital delirium is severely under - diagnosed, even when delirium symptoms are described in the medical records.
- The number of delirium events revealed by medical record - based review is 9 times that of discharge diagnoses.
- More severe delirium patients are more likely to be diagnosed with delirium in discharge reports.
- Under - diagnosis and under - recording of delirium may have an adverse impact on clinical follow - up and delirium research.
- There is a need to implement systematic delirium diagnosis and recording in routine inpatient care.