Abstract:Biodiversity conservation and agricultural production have been largely framed as separate goals for landscapes in the discourse on land use. Although there is an increasing tendency to move away from this dichotomy in theory, the tendency is perpetuated by the spatially explicit approaches used in research and management practice. Transition zones (TZ) have previously been defined as areas where two adjacent fields or patches interact, and so they occur abundantly throughout agricultural landscapes. Biodiversity patterns in TZ have been extensively studied, but their relationship to yield patterns and social–ecological dimensions has been largely neglected. Focusing on European, temperate agricultural landscapes, we outline three areas of research and management that together demonstrate how TZ might be used to facilitate an integrated landscape approach: (i) plant and animal species’ use and response to boundaries and the resulting effects on yield, for a deeper understanding of how landscape structure shapes quantity and quality of TZ; (ii) local knowledge on field or patch‐level management and its interactions with biodiversity and yield in TZ, and (iii) conflict prevention and collaborative management across land‐use boundaries. Biodiversity conservation and agricultural production have been largely framed as separate goals for landscapes in the discourse on land use. Although there is an increasing tendency to move away from this dichotomy in theory, the tendency is perpetuated by the spatially explicit approaches used in research and management practice. Transition zones (TZ) have previously been defined as areas where two adjacent fields or patches interact, and so they occur abundantly throughout agricultural landscapes. Biodiversity patterns in TZ have been extensively studied, but their relationship to yield patterns and social–ecological dimensions has been largely neglected. Focusing on European, temperate agricultural landscapes, we outline three areas of research and management that together demonstrate how TZ might be used to facilitate an integrated landscape approach: (i) plant and animal species’ use and response to boundaries and the resulting effects on yield, for a deeper understanding of how landscape structure shapes quantity and quality of TZ; (ii) local knowledge on field or patch‐level management and its interactions with biodiversity and yield in TZ, and (iii) conflict prevention and collaborative management across land‐use boundaries. We explore three interrelated steps for understanding biodiversity–yield relationships in Transition Zones (TZ), and how this understanding can be used in praxis. Understanding and implementing knowledge on biodiversity–yield relationships can support a paradigm shift from a compartmentalized, individualized approach to managing them collaboratively by taking TZ into account.

Biodiversity–production feedback effects lead to intensification traps in agricultural landscapes

Avoiding lose–lose situations in agricultural landscapes

Ecological intensification and diversification approaches to maintain biodiversity, ecosystem services and food production in a changing world

Ecological Intensification: Local Innovation to Address Global Challenges

Multitrophic biodiversity enhances ecosystem functions, services and ecological intensification in agriculture

Global impacts of future cropland expansion and intensification on agricultural markets and biodiversity

Biodiversity Responses to Agricultural Practices in Cropland and Natural Habitats.

Landscape simplification filters species traits and drives biotic homogenization

Deciphering the Biodiversity-Production Mutualism in the Global Food Security Debate

Insect conservation in agricultural landscapes needs both high crop heterogeneity and semi-natural habitats

Plant diversity and Ecological Intensification in crop production systems

Analysis of complex trophic networks reveals the signature of land-use intensification on soil communities in agroecosystems

Author Response for "crop and Landscape Heterogeneity Increase Biodiversity in Agricultural Landscapes: A Global Review and Meta‐analysis"

Addressing future trade-offs between biodiversity and cropland expansion to improve food security

Complex agricultural landscapes host more biodiversity than simple ones: A global meta-analysis

Mitigating Farmland Biodiversity Loss: A Bio-Economic Model of Land Consolidation and Pesticide Use

Sustainable intensification in agriculture: the richer shade of green. A review

Contrasting responses of above- and belowground diversity to multiple components of land-use intensity

Transition zones across agricultural field boundaries for integrated landscape research and management of biodiversity and yields

Sustainable intensification: overcoming land and water constraints on food production