The associations between levels of the neuroscientific self and borderline personality traits

Charlotte Wardell,Michael Do,Talitha C. Ford,Aron T. Hill,Soukayna Bekkali,Melissa Kirkovski,David Skvarc,Kimberly Jones,Luke McInerney,Peter G. Enticott,Peter H. Donaldson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.112748
IF: 3.95
2024-06-10
Personality and Individual Differences
Abstract:Processes contributing to forming and maintaining the self are matters of longstanding debate and significance, for example regarding disorders manifesting aberrant self-processing, such as borderline personality disorder. One theory proposes a hierarchy of self-referential processes including interoceptive-, exteroceptive-, and mental-self-processing levels. No systematic examination of these levels in relation to borderline personality traits has been conducted. Understanding this relationship may highlight underlying mechanisms contributing to observable borderline personality pathology. The sample of 118 healthy adults (mean age = 36.4 years, SD = 14.6, 80 females) completed an online survey, using instruments indexing self-processing at interoceptive, exteroceptive and mental levels. More atypical embodied sense of self (an exteroceptive index) and lower self-insight (a mental index) were associated with higher self-relevant borderline personality trait levels. There was no evidence of a relationship between interoceptive and self-relevant borderline personality trait measures. These findings support exteroceptive- and mental-self-processing atypicalities in the manifestation of self-relevant borderline personality traits. Specifically targeting these domains behaviourally and narratively may augment existing evidence-based borderline personality disorder interventions.
psychology, social
What problem does this paper attempt to address?