Inflated effect estimates for vitamin D supplementation are driven by common meta-analytical errors

Eric T. Trexler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15502783.2024.2413668
2024-10-09
Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition
Abstract:Purpose Han et al. (J Int Soc Sports Nutr 16:55, 2019) sought to quantify the effects of vitamin D supplementation on strength outcomes among athletes in a meta-analysis. The authors reported a pooled effect size (standardized mean difference; SMD) of -0.75 (95% CI: -1.82 to 0.32, p = 0.17) in favor of supplementation, but the analytical approach was not appropriate for a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials and the effect sizes were calculated incorrectly. This letter discusses how these issues impact the results and interpretation of the paper, then provides an update on the estimated average effect of vitamin D on strength outcomes in athletes.
nutrition & dietetics,sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?