Abstract:Purpose This article considers Inverse Gaussian distribution as the basic lifetime model for the test units. The unknown model parameters are estimated using the method of moments, the method of maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods. As part of maximum likelihood analysis, this article employs an expectation-maximization algorithm to simplify numerical computation. Subsequently, Bayesian estimates are obtained using the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. This article then presents the design of optimal censoring schemes using a design criterion that deals with the precision of a particular system lifetime quantile. The optimal censoring schemes are obtained after taking into account budget constraints. Design/methodology/approach This article first presents classical and Bayesian statistical inference for Progressive Type-I Interval censored data. Subsequently, this article considers the design of optimal Progressive Type-I Interval censoring schemes after incorporating budget constraints. Findings A real dataset is analyzed to demonstrate the methods developed in this article. The adequacy of the lifetime model is ensured using a simulation-based goodness-of-fit test. Furthermore, the performance of various estimators is studied using a detailed simulation experiment. It is observed that the maximum likelihood estimator relatively outperforms the method of moment estimator. Furthermore, the posterior median fares better among Bayesian estimators even in the absence of any subjective information. Furthermore, it is observed that the budget constraints have real implications on the optimal design of censoring schemes. Originality/value The proposed methodology may be used for analyzing any Progressive Type-I Interval Censored data for any lifetime model. The methodology adopted to obtain the optimal censoring schemes may be particularly useful for reliability engineers in real-life applications.

Bayesian and non‐Bayesian inference of the process capacity index Spk′ under progressive type‐II right censored scheme

Bayesian and classical inference of the process capability index under progressive type-II censoring scheme

Classical and Bayesian inference of Cpc for Wilson–Hilferty distribution under progressively first‐failure type‐II censoring samples

A Bayesian Evaluation Approach To Process Capability Index

Robust process capability indices and statistical inference based on model selection

Estimating the Generalizations of Process Capability Index Cpmk in the Presence of Outliers

A New SVDD-Based Multivariate Non-parametric Process Capability Index

Bayes Analysis of Two-Parameter Pareto Distribution under Progressively First-Failure-censored Data

A Process Capability Index Based on the Proportion of Conformanceand the Estimation of Its Lower Confidence Limit

A Conjugate Bayesian Approach for Calculating Process Capability Indices.

The Bayesian estimation of process capability indices for multi-batch and low volume manufacturing

Comparison And Extensions On Estimation Of Non-Normal Process Capability Indices

Reliability Analysis of Proportional Hazard Rate Model under Progressively Type-Ⅱ Censored Samples

On inference and design under progressive type-I interval censoring scheme for inverse Gaussian lifetime model

Inference for depending competing risks from Marshall–Olikin bivariate Kies distribution under generalized progressive hybrid censoring

Pivotal-based inference for a Pareto distribution under the adaptive progressive Type-II censoring scheme

Bayesian Inference for Inverse Power Exponentiated Pareto Distribution Using Progressive Type-II Censoring with Application to Flood-Level Data Analysis

Hypothesis Testing of Process Capability Index Cpk from the Perspective of Generalized Fiducial Inference

A Comparative Study on PCIs for Non-normal Data

Inference on process capability index for a new lifetime distribution