How do hard regimes absorb, overlap, and squeeze out soft regimes? Insights from global carbon markets

Ling Chen,Mengying Xie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-023-00064-3
2023-03-01
Global Public Policy and Governance
Abstract:Varieties of regimes exist in carbon markets, but little is known about regime interactions within this complex. This article particularly focuses on interactions between voluntary carbon markets (VCMs) and compliance carbon markets (CCMs) and treats VCMs as soft regimes while CCMs as hard regimes. It utilizes comparative case studies and grounded theory to dissect drivers of carbon market linkages and regime interactions. We argue that institutional complementarities of participants, market boundaries, and operation rules exist between VCMs and CCMs, providing prerequisites for interactions between soft and hard regimes. Furthermore, there are four types of causal mechanisms for regime interactions, namely cognitive, rule, behavioral, and functional interactions, which mainly occur in the direction of VCMs toward CCMs. In addition, regime interactions within carbon markets evolve dynamically. Soft regimes are contingent on the development of hard regimes, which can gradually absorb, overlap, and squeeze out soft regimes. This research advances our understanding of complex regime interactions within carbon markets and provides theoretical insights for the transformation of future carbon markets.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?