Abstract:Background: Studies have highlighted common challenges and barriers to patient engagement in research, but most were based on patient partners' or academic researchers' experiences. A better understanding of how both groups differentially experience their partnership could help identify strategies to improve collaboration in patient engagement research. Aim: This study aimed to describe and compare patient partners' and academic researchers' experiences in patient engagement research. Methods: Based on a participatory approach, a descriptive qualitative study was conducted with patient partners and academic researchers who are involved in the PriCARE research programme in primary health care to examine their experience of patient engagement. Individual semi-structured interviews with patient partners (n = 7) and academic researchers (n = 15) were conducted. Academic researchers' interview verbatims, deidentified patient partners' summaries of their interviews and summaries of meetings with patient partners were analysed using inductive thematic analysis in collaboration with patient partners. Results: Patient partners and academic researchers' experiences with patient engagement are captured within four themes: (1) evolving relationships; (2) creating an environment that fosters patient engagement; (3) striking a balance; and (4) impact and value of patient engagement. Evolving relationships refers to how partnerships grew and improved over time with an acceptance of tensions and willingness to move beyond them, two-way communication and leadership of key team members. Creating an environment that fosters patient engagement requires appropriate structural support, such as clear descriptions of patient partner roles; adequate training for all team members; institutional guidance on patient engagement; regular and appropriate translation services; and financial assistance. For patient partners and academic researchers, striking a balance referred to the challenge of reconciling patient partners' interests and established research practices. Finally, both groups recognized the value and positive impact of patient engagement in the programme in terms of improving the relevance of research and the applicability of results. While patient partners and academic researchers identified similar challenges and strategies, their experiences of patient engagement differed according to their own backgrounds, motives and expectations. Conclusion: Both patient partners and academic researchers highlighted the importance of finding a balance between providing structure or guidelines for patient engagement, while allowing for flexibility along the way. Patient or public contribution: Patient partners from the PriCARE research programme were involved in the following aspects of the current study: (1) development of the research objectives; (2) planning of the research design; (3) development and validation of data collection tools (i.e., interview guides); (4) production of data (i.e., acted as interviewees); (5) validation of data analysis tools (code book); (6) analysis of qualitative data; and (7) drafting of the manuscript and contributing to other knowledge translation activities, such as conference presentations and the creation of a short animated video.

Engaging student analysis of the practitioner‐patient relationship assessed with reflective outcomes

Is Reflective Learning Visible in Online Discussion Forums for Medical Students on General Practice Placements? A Qualitative Study

An evaluation of an interprofessional practice-based learning environment using student reflections

Reflective writing: Implementation and learning perception from students and teachers of French nursing schools

Intra- and interprofessional practices through fresh eyes: a qualitative analysis of medical students' early workplace experiences

Conceptualizing patient interactions eliciting empathy, compassion, reflection, and social projection: A model with analysis

Patients' perspectives on their motivations for participating in non-clinical medical teaching and what they gain from their experience: a qualitative study informed by critical theory

Exploring the Impact of a Vicarious Learning Approach on Student Pharmacists' Professional Identity Formation Using a Simulated Pharmacist-Patient Encounter

The impact of using an authentic patient video on health professional students' attitudes toward interprofessional and person-centered care

Reflection before and after clinical practice-Enhancing and broadening experience through self-, peer- and teacher-guided learning

Best Practice for Teaching and Learning Strategies to Facilitate Student Reflection in Pre-Registration Health Professional Education: An Integrative Review

Patient and researcher experiences of patient engagement in primary care health care research: A participatory qualitative study

Impact of physician-patient relationship training on medical students' interpersonal skills during simulated medical consultations: a cross-sectional study

Embedding Interprofessional Education in Clinical Settings: Medical and Dental Student Perceptions of a Patient Interview-Storytelling Experience

How do interprofessional student teams interact in a primary care clinic? A qualitative analysis using activity theory

Taking the next step: How student reflective essays about difficult clinical encounters demonstrate professional identity formation

Studying How Patient Engagement Influences Research: A Mixed Methods Study

A realist evaluation exploring simulated patient role-play in pharmacist undergraduate communication training

Gut feeling: A grounded theory study to identify clinical educators' reasoning processes in putting students on a learning contract

Student reflections following exposure to a case-based interprofessional learning experience: Preliminary findings

Reflecting on professional identity in undergraduate medical education: implementation of a novel longitudinal course