Abstract:In many situations, consumers prefer regional over non-regional products and are willing to pay a price premium. Yet, the concept of regionality is often ambiguous and misleading. While consumers perceive something ‘regional’ as being produced within their direct home region, legally the term only describes something produced within any specific region. This discrepancy between consumer perceptions and legal requirements allows for loopholes in branding strategies on the managers’ side through which consumers may intentionally be deceived. By using regionality-brand strategies, managers may (legally) deceive consumers, create false associations and subsequently boost brand attitudes.In the present study, we assess the concept of regionality by exploring the discrepancy between legal requirements and consumer perceptions. We analyze how consumers interpret the concept of regionality and which associations are linked to the concept.In complementary experimental studies (total N = 720 consumers) in varying product categories we assess the impact of different regional designations on consumers’ attitudes and behavioral intentions towards the respective brand.The present results show that consumers (mis)interpret regionality as ‘distance’. Particularly with typical product categories, consumers tend to largely prefer brands with regional designations, as perceived regionality positively correlates with perceived environmental friendliness and healthiness.The results further show how different regionality-brand strategies impact consumers’ brand attitudes. Brands with an unspecific regional designation or a regional branding (brand name) thereby significantly increase consumers’ brand attitudes compared to a neutral brand showing how managers may deceive consumers.However, the present findings further prove that detection of such regionality deception leads to a significant drop in consumers’ brand attitudes, regardless of the underlying product category or regionality-based branding strategies. We explore this ‘dark’ side of potential deceptive regionality-brand strategies by exploring consumers’ negative reactions when they find out that they were deceived.We, thus, shed light on the surprisingly understudied topic of regionality from a theoretical perspective and provide concrete managerial insights on the use of regionality-brand strategies.

Thin line between country, city, and region branding

Region branding: The case of the Baltic Sea Region

Co-branding public place brands: towards an alternative approach to place branding

Comparing city image and brand identity in polycentric regions using network analysis

City Branding in Polycentric Urban Regions: Identification, Profiling and Transformation in the Randstad and Rhine-Ruhr

One Clear Image? Challenging Simplicity in Place Branding

Questioning a “one size fits all” city brand: Developing a branded house strategy for place brand management

Rethinking Place Branding From a Political Perspective: Urban Governance, Public Diplomacy, and Sustainable Policy Making

Discussions between Place Branding and Territorial Brand in Regional Development—A Classification Model Proposal for a Territorial Brand

City Branding and the Link to Urban Planning: Theories, Practices, and Challenges

Identity and Destination Branding among Residents: How Does Brand Self‐congruity Influence Brand Attitude and Ambassadorial Behavior?

Branding soft spaces

City Branding Dimensions, Strategies, and Obstacles: A Literature Review

Deceptive Use of the ‘Regionality’ Concept in Product Labelling: An Abstract

The multidimensionality of place identity: A systematic concept analysis and framework of place-related identity elements

The Roles of Branding in Public Administration and Place Management: Possibilities and Pitfalls

Branding cities, regions and countries: the roadmap of place brand equity

Combining Brand Theory with Space and Atmosphere Theory

Country of origin branding: an integrative perspective

Two tales of one city: Image versus identity