Abstract:At the remote UNESCO Word Heritage Site Te Wāhipounamu, we show that eDNA analysis is a highly sensitive tool with strong potential for biodiversity surveys, which is still limited by the unavailability of local reference data. We hope that by demonstrating the extend of divergence between eDNA and more traditional tools in a real‐life case study of a remote region of high conservation interest, we further strengthen the case to fund the establishment of local eDNA reference data, also to benefit Te Wāhipounamu. Effective management of biodiversity requires regular surveillance of multiple species. Analysis of environmental DNA (eDNA) by metabarcoding holds promise to achieve this relatively easily. However, taxonomy‐focused eDNA surveys need suitable molecular reference data, which are often lacking, particularly at the species level and for remote locations. To evaluate the comparability of environmental DNA surveys and traditional surveys in a real‐life case study in a marine area of high conservation value, we conducted a biodiversity survey of the fish in remote and pristine Te Wāhipounamu/Fiordland (Aotearoa/New Zealand), incorporating multiple data sources. We compared eDNA‐derived species identifications against Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUV) data collected at the same time and locations as eDNA. We also cross‐referenced both eDNA and BRUV data against literature and the Ocean Biodiversity Information System (OBIS), with literature and OBIS data representing a summary of multiple traditional surveying approaches. In total, we found 116 fish species in our study area. Environmental DNA detected 43 species; however, only three of those species overlap with species known from the literature, OBIS, or our BRUV analyses. A total of 61 fish species were known from the region from the literature, while OBIS listed 28 species, and our BRUV analyses picked up 26 species. BRUV data coincided more strongly than eDNA data with literature and OBIS data. Twenty of the 26 species detected by BRUV were known from literature and OBIS. We argue that limitated DNA reference databases are the main cause of this discrepancy, and our results indicate that eDNA of rare and endangered species can be detected if matching reference data were available. Environmental DNA analyses can only identify species present among reference data and with relaxed taxonomic assignment parameters may converge on relatives of detected species if the actually existing species themselves are missing among reference data. However, the high number of species detected by our eDNA analyses confirms that eDNA could be a powerful tool for biodiversity surveys if suitable investments in local reference databases were made.

Bat box monitoring: testing the efficacy of eDNA to confirm box use

Bat box monitoring: comparing multiple contemporary methods

Out of thin air: surveying tropical bat roosts through air sampling of eDNA

Proving a negative; estimating species ′Confidence in Absence for Decision-Making′ (CIADM) using environmental DNA monitoring

A simple and fast method for estimating bat roost locations

The use of environmental DNA for biodiversity monitoring in lentic and lotic ecosystems

Passive Acoustic Monitoring Reveals the Role of Habitat Affinity in Sensitivity of Sub‐tropical East Asian Bats to Fragmentation

Comparison of traditional and molecular surveys of fish biodiversity in southern Te Wāhipounamu/Fiordland (Aotearoa/New Zealand)

eDNAir: proof of concept that animal DNA can be collected from air sampling

Technical note: successful DNA amplification of DNA from non-destructive buccal swabbing in Vespertilionid and Rhinolophid bats

Wetland biodiversity in Aotearoa New Zealand: an eDNA perspective on exotic and non-exotic species

eDNA Metabarcoding Benchmarked towards Conventional Survey Methods in Amphibian Monitoring

Koalas, friends and foes—The application of airborne eDNA for the biomonitoring of threatened species

Evaluating the effects of laboratory protocols on eDNA detection probability for an endangered freshwater fish

Detection of introduced and resident marine species using environmental DNA metabarcoding of sediment and water

Optimising species detection probability and sampling effort in lake fish eDNA surveys

Assessing the utility of marine filter feeders for environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity monitoring

From DNA to diagnostics: A case study using macroinvertebrate metabarcoding to assess the effectiveness of restoration measures in a Dutch stream

Using PIT tags to infer bat reproductive status and parturition date: busy nights during lactation

Species-specific SNP arrays for non-invasive genetic monitoring of a vulnerable bat

Using mobile acoustic monitoring and false‐positive N‐mixture models to estimate bat abundance and population trends