Abstract:Abstract Many products sold on online platforms have additional features like fees for services, shipping, luggage, upgrades etc. We study when a two-sided platform shrouds additional features towards potentially-naive buyers. We explore a novel mechanism according to which platforms shroud to manipulate network externalities between buyers and sellers. Exploring this mechanism, we argue the advent of online marketplaces led to less-transparent markets. First, platforms have stronger incentives to shroud seller fees than sellers themselves. Second, platforms shroud their own fees less if they earn more revenue from sellers; so when sellers on the platform compete more fiercely, platforms—somewhat perversely—shroud more. We connect these results to many applications and the current debate on regulating online platforms.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is how, on online platforms, the platform side can manipulate the network externalities between buyers and sellers by hiding extra fees, and the impact of such behavior on market transparency. Specifically, the author studied under what circumstances the platform would conceal additional fees such as service fees, shipping fees, baggage fees, and upgrade fees from potential "naive" buyers, and explored a new mechanism in which the platform manipulates the network externalities between buyers and sellers by concealing these fees. The author believes that with the rise of the online market, the market has become less transparent. The platform has a stronger incentive to conceal the seller's fees, and when the platform obtains more revenue from the seller, it will reduce the concealment of its own fees. Therefore, when sellers compete more fiercely on the platform, the platform will instead conceal more fees.
### Main research questions:
1. **Why does the platform conceal extra fees**: Even if these fees are not earned by the platform itself, why does the platform have the incentive to conceal these fees?
2. **The impact of the platform's behavior on market transparency**: How do these behaviors of the platform affect market transparency, and how should regulatory agencies intervene to improve market transparency?
### Research methods:
The author constructed a two - sided market model in which the platform can decide whether to conceal the seller's extra fees. In the model, it is assumed that buyers are divided into two types: naive buyers and sophisticated buyers. Naive buyers will ignore the concealed extra fees, while sophisticated buyers, although they will notice these fees, will incur a certain trouble cost for processing this information.
### Main findings:
1. **The platform's motivation**: The platform has the motivation to conceal the seller's fees because this will make the product look cheaper, attract more buyers to join the platform, and thus increase the seller's revenue. However, this practice will cause trouble costs for sophisticated buyers.
2. **The impact of market competition**: When sellers compete more fiercely on the platform, the platform will conceal more fees because this can attract more buyers, thereby increasing the seller's willingness to participate.
3. **Regulatory suggestions**: The author proposes that regulatory agencies cannot rely on the platform to design a transparent market by itself, but need to take measures to force the platform to improve transparency, such as requiring the platform to clearly display all fees before the transaction.
### Conclusion:
This paper reveals the mechanism by which online platforms manipulate market network externalities by concealing extra fees, and proposes suggestions on how regulatory agencies should intervene to improve market transparency. This research is of great significance for understanding the operating mechanism of the online market and formulating effective market regulatory policies.