Two Successful Cases of Operation for Perforated Gastric Ulcer
E. Andrews
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.2125.759
1901-09-21
British Medical Journal
Abstract:negative. This, considering the well-known fact that KilebsLoeffler bacilli are occasionally to be found in the throats of healthy persons, is eminently satisfactory. The most disappointing feature about our series is that On 25 occasions we failed to find Klebs-Loeffier bacillus -on the swab or culture taken from cases which were clinically diphtheria. Some of these cases were very typical, several of them dying of cardiac failure; others, however, were less distinctive. The fallacies of a negative examination are obvious. First, our inability to find the bacilli on the coverslip does not necessarily prove their absence from the culture in which they may not be very numerous. Secondly, insemination of the culture media may have failed. Thirdly, the bacilli may not have been transferred from the throat to the swab. In purely laryngeal cases it is quite possible that the bacilli may be present in the throat in very small numbers, or be absent. In pharyngeal cases-and especially in those cases where other bacteria are present in large numbers-only a very few Klebs-Loeffier bacilli may be transferred to the siwab. Fourthly, though the bacilli may be transferred to the swab, they may be incapable of growth, as when a swab is taken directly after the throat has been treated with an antiseptic. Lastly, there is the general fallacy attaching to a single negative result. For this reason it cannot be too strongly urged that where there are definite clinical symptoms pointing to a diagnosis of diphtheria the value of a single negative bacteriological examination is practically nil; it is not until several negative results have been obtained that -one is jtLstified in believing that the disease is not diphtheria. The importance of -this can hardly be too strongly insisted on. Concurrently with the examination of this series, two of Us have been examining a second series consisting of about 40 cases, in which we have examined preparations from the cultures after staining by methylene blue as well as by Neisser's method. On two occasions Neisser's stain enabled us to arrive at a positive diagnosis with ease when there was some difficulty with the methylene-blue specimens; but in both cases we were satisfied, after careful examination, that the Klebs-Loeffier bacillus was present in the methylene-blue preparations. One of the two cases was undoubtedly diphtheria clinically. In no case did we find that Neisser's stain showed bacilli having the staining reaction of the KlebsLoeffler bacillus, when at the same time the methylene-blue specimens failed to shew Klebs-Loeffier bacilli. One of the most satisfactory features about our series is that out of the 48 cases in which the bacillus of diphtheria was found in the culture we were able to diagnose i8 by the microscopical examination of the coverslips made directly from the swab. We feel convinced that if coverslip preparations were made directly from the throat without the loss of any time, this number of positive results would be increased. On many occasions it is highly desirable to make a diagnosis at as early a moment as possible, and our observations show that a positive diagnosis was possible from the examination of the swab in I8 per cent. of all the cases, and in 37.5 per cent. of the cases of proved diphtheria. If more care were expended in the taking of the swab, so that a really good coverslip preparation could be made from it, we think that a higher percentage of cases would yield an indisputable result. Of course, a negative result would be of little or no value, and it is always well to confirm the result, even if positive, by subsequent examination of the culture. As a result of our observations, we feel that Neisser's stain is a valuable one in several ways: First, a positive diagnosis is rendered more certain for those who cannot be considered as experts, since it is often easier to diagnose the Klebs-Lceffler bacillus after staining by Neisser than after staining by ordinary methylene blue, as we think that for the inexperienced the bacilli after staining by Neisser's method, are much more characteristic than after staining by methylene blue. Secondly, a trustworthy positive result may be obtained from the microscopical -examihation -of a preparation made direct from the s*ab, and,this method is, we think, not only more reliable when Neisser's stain is used than when th* ordinary methylene blue is employe('. alone, but is more obvious. Thirdly, the use of Neisser's stain does not appear to introduce any fallacy not found in the application of other methods.