Abstract:www.ccmjournal.org March 2013 • Volume 41 • Number 3 Aspiration is a common complication in hospitalized patients, which is usually associated with poor outcomes, especially in those with neuromuscular diseases, gastrointestinal or esophageal dysfunction, and loss of consciousness. The clinical manifestations of aspiration vary depending on volume and contents of aspiration as well as the host’s response. Considering quick deterioration of lung function due to chemical and bacterial insults after aspiration, it is critical to have an assay to detect and discriminate chemical and bacterial pneumonia to guide antibiotic treatment. Several biomarkers, such as pepsin and lipid laden alveolar macrophages have been identified as evidence of aspiration because both of them suggested lipid content from gastrointestinal tract, especially in children with gastro esophageal reflux and gastric contents aspiration–induced bronchopulmonary dysplasia in neonates (1). In adults patients, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) pepsin in intubated patients has been considered an indicator for aspiration of gastric contents and also a major risk factor for pneumonia (2, 3). To further diagnose etiology of aspiration pneumonia, serum procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein, soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (sTERM-1), and cytokines profiles (4) have been investigated for feasibility to discriminate bacterial aspiration pneumonia and chemical pneumonitis besides as a marker to diagnose aspiration. In addition, serial measurements of serum PCT was associated with the prognosis of pulmonary aspiration (5) and BAL sTREM-1 levels could be potentially useful in distinguishing BAL culture–positive from BAL culture–negative aspiration (6). However, both the sensitivity and specificity (76% and 38% for PCT using a threshold of 2.0 ng/ml, 65.8% and 91.9% for sTREM-1 using a threshold of 250 pg/ml) to diagnose aspiration pneumonia and chemical pneumonitis using above biomarker have not been widely accepted. In this issue of Critical Care Medicine, Weiss and colleagues (7) studied the role of BAL α-amylase in diagnosis of aspiration in a retrospective study. Total 296 BAL samples were collected within 72 hrs after endotracheal intubation from 280 mechanically ventilated patients in five medical centers, and the relationship between BAL amylase concentration and pre-intubation aspiration risk factors as well as the BAL microbial culture results were analyzed. What they found were 1) there was a strong association between BAL amylase concentration and traditional risk factors for aspiration; 2) BAL amylase concentration may predict bacterial pneumonia; 3) if BAL amylase concentration cutoff value was < 125 units/L, the sensitivity for predicting bacterial pneumonia was 70%, with a negative predictive value of 85%. If combined with clinical information, BAL amylase might be helpful in early diagnosis and the management of suspected aspiration. Actually, as early as in the 1980s, there was some evidence showing (8, 9) that BAL amylase was derived from oropharyngeal contents and aspiration or pulmonary complication. Unfortunately, no further clinical studies have been conducted to confirm above findings until Weiss et al revealed the significance of BAL amylase in diagnosing and differentiating bacterial pneumonia after aspiration with high sensitivity and negative predictive value. Nevertheless, this study does have some limitations as the author had addressed in the text, such as the absence of a gold standard to diagnose bacterial pneumonia and the potential confounding factors. Even though the amylase in BAL has a relatively long-lasting detection window, its dynamic changes of activity should not be neglected. Multiple quantitative detection of BAL amylase would be preferred other than one time measurement. In addition, BAL is an invasive approach which also needs special training before operation, the volume and location of BAL should be standardized to have comparison between different institutes. In some patients without artificial intubation, it is not practical to have BAL examination. Thus, given the current limitations, well-designed Cohort studies should be conducted to test whether this is a robust finding. In conclusion, notwithstanding the caveat, the results from this study may guide the clinical management of aspiration.

Utility of bile acids in large airway bronchial wash versus bronchoalveolar lavage as biomarkers of microaspiration in lung transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort study

Bile Acid Aspiration Associates with CLAD and Affects the Bronchial District Lipid Profile: Targeted Bile Acid Metabolomics and Lipidomics in Bronchial Washing

Bronchoalveolar bile acid and inflammatory markers to identify high-risk lung transplant recipients with reflux and microaspiration

Differences in the Lipidomic Profile of Bronchial Washing (bw) and Bronchoalveolar Lavage (bal) in Lung Transplanted Patients

Effect of bronchoalveolar lavage on the use of antibiotics in patients with severe pneumonia

Airway pepsinogen A4 identifies lung transplant recipients with microaspiration and predicts chronic lung allograft dysfunction

Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid-Isolated Biomarkers for the Diagnostic and Prognostic Assessment of Lung Cancer

Utility of Bronchoalveolar Lavage and Transbronchial Biopsy in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease

Bronchoalveolar lavage cytokine-based risk stratification of minimal acute rejection in clinically stable lung transplant recipients

Evaluation of Donor Lungs for Transplantation: The Efficacy of Screening Bronchoscopy for Detecting Donor Aspiration and Its Relationship to the Resulting Allograft Function in Corresponding Recipients

Abstract 4463: Tumor-derived Cell-Free DNA from Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid (BALF): A Potential Liquid Biopsy Analysis in Lung Cancer Patients

A potential mechanism by which aspiration of duodenogastric fluid augments the risk for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation

The bronchoalveolar lavage dilution conundrum: an updated view on a long-standing problem

Amylase in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid: a New Marker for Pulmonary Aspiration.

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation consensus statement for the standardization of bronchoalveolar lavage in lung transplantation

The usefulness of liquid-based cytology of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid combined with bronchial brush specimens in lung cancer diagnosis

Optimising the yield from bronchoalveolar lavage on human participants in infectious disease immunology research

Clinical efficacy of bronchoalveolar lavage in the treatment of small airway diseases in children

Global Proteomics Analysis of Circulating Extracellular Vesicles Isolated from Lung Transplant Recipients

Lung Donor Bronchoalveolar Lavage Positivity: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Lung Transplant Recipients' Outcome

Immunoprofiling bronchoalveolar lavage cells reveals multifaceted smoking-associated immune dysfunction