A randomized trial on three different minimally invasive decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis. Five years follow-up from the NORDSTEN-SST

Erland Hermansen,Kari Indrekvam,Eric Franssen,Tor Åge Myklebust,Ivar Magne Austevoll,Christian Hellum,Kjersti Storheim,Ingrid Fjeldheim Bånerud,Eira Kathleen Ebbs,Jørn Aaen,Hasan Banitalebi,Jens Ivar Brox,Clemens Weber,Tore Solberg,Arild Hjulstad,Helena Brisby
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08514-0
IF: 2.721
2024-10-26
European Spine Journal
Abstract:The short-term clinical outcome for midline-preserving posterior decompression techniques was comparable. The aim of this study was to evaluate long-term clinical results after three different midline-preserving posterior decompression techniques.
clinical neurology,orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?