Abstract:There is extensive health and public health literature on the ‘evidence-policy gap’, exploring the frustrating experiences of scientists trying to secure a response to the problems and solutions they raise and identifying the need for better evidence to reduce policymaker uncertainty. We offer a new perspective by using policy theory to propose research with greater impact, identifying the need to use persuasion to reduce ambiguity, and to adapt to multi-level policymaking systems.We identify insights from secondary data, namely systematic reviews, critical analysis and policy theories relevant to evidence-based policymaking. The studies are drawn primarily from countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. We combine empirical and normative elements to identify the ways in which scientists can, do and could influence policy.We identify two important dilemmas, for scientists and researchers, that arise from our initial advice. First, effective actors combine evidence with manipulative emotional appeals to influence the policy agenda – should scientists do the same, or would the reputational costs outweigh the policy benefits? Second, when adapting to multi-level policymaking, should scientists prioritise ‘evidence-based’ policymaking above other factors? The latter includes governance principles such the ‘co-production’ of policy between local public bodies, interest groups and service users. This process may be based primarily on values and involve actors with no commitment to a hierarchy of evidence.We conclude that successful engagement in ‘evidence-based policymaking’ requires pragmatism, combining scientific evidence with governance principles, and persuasion to translate complex evidence into simple stories. To maximise the use of scientific evidence in health and public health policy, researchers should recognise the tendency of policymakers to base judgements on their beliefs, and shortcuts based on their emotions and familiarity with information; learn ‘where the action is’, and be prepared to engage in long-term strategies to be able to influence policy; and, in both cases, decide how far you are willing to go to persuade policymakers to act and secure a hierarchy of evidence underpinning policy. These are value-driven and political, not just ‘evidence-based’, choices.

Evidence-based policymaking and the wicked problem of SDG 5 Gender Equality

Navigating the Wicked Policy Problem: An In-Depth Analysis of Policy Dilemmas and Innovative Approaches for Effective Problem Solving

Aligning evidence generation and use across health, development, and environment

Challenges to achieve the Goal 5 of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) in South Africa

Gender equality and women’s empowerment in Arab countries: a bibliometric review of the literature on SDG 5

The new evidence-based policy: public participation between ‘hard evidence’ and democracy in practice

SDGs Managers' Assessment Bias and Their Implications for Preventing Violence Against Women in Companies

Evidence-Based Medicine: Feminist Criticisms and Implications for Women's Health

Delivering gender justice in academia through gender equality plans? Normative and practical challenges

Evidence-based policymaking is not like evidence-based medicine, so how far should you go to bridge the divide between evidence and policy?

Redesigning the business of development: the case of the World Economic Forum and global risk management

Evidence Gap Maps as Critical Information Communication Devices for Evidence-based Public Policy

Exploring the concepts of decent work through the lens of SDG 8: addressing challenges and inadequacies

Global governance as patchwork: the making of the Sustainable Development Goals

No risk, no gain: invest in women and girls by funding advocacy, organizing, litigation and work to shift culture

Exploring the synergy of corporate gender diversity, sustainability committee, and reporting ESG practices: An international evidence

A Bibliometric Analysis of Women's Empowerment Studies Post Sustainable Development Goal Adoption Periods (2015–2022)

Inequalities in Research on Food Environment Policies: An Evidence Map of Global Evidence from 2010-2020

Gender equality: progress, setbacks, and COVID-19 challenges toward 2030

Bringing Evidence to Policy to Achieve Health-Related MDGs for All: Justification and Design of the EPI-4 Project in China, India, Indonesia, and Vietnam

Social Economy, Gender Equality at Work and the 2030 Agenda: Theory and Evidence from Spain