Abstract:Abstract Background There exist many different methods of allocating participants to treatment groups during a randomised controlled trial. Although there is research that explores trial characteristics that are associated with the choice of method, there is still a lot of variety in practice not explained. This study used qualitative methods to explore more deeply the motivations behind researchers’ choice of randomisation, and which features of the method they use to evaluate the performance of these methods. Methods Data was collected from online focus groups with various stakeholders involved in the randomisation process. Focus groups were recorded and then transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis was used to analyse the transcripts. Results Twenty-five participants from twenty clinical trials units across the UK were recruited to take part in one of four focus groups. Four main themes were identified: how randomisation methods are selected; researchers’ opinions of the different methods; which features of the method are desirable and ways to measure method features. Most researchers agree that the randomisation method should be selected based on key trial characteristics; however, for many, a unit standard is in place. Opinions of methods were varied with some participants favouring stratified blocks and others favouring minimisation. This was generally due to researchers’ perception of the effect these methods had on balance and predictability. Generally, predictability was considered more important than balance as adjustments cannot be made for it; however, most researchers felt that the importance of these two methods was dependent on the design of the study. Balance is usually evaluated by tabulating variables by treatment arm and looking for perceived imbalances, predictability was generally considered much harder to measure, partly due to differing definitions. Conclusion There is a wide variety in practice on how randomisation methods are selected and researcher’s opinions on methods. The difference in practice observed when looking at randomisation method selection can be explained by a difference in unit practice, and also by a difference in researchers prioritisation of balance and predictability. The findings of this study show a need for more guidance on randomisation method selection.

Handbook of Statistical Methods for Randomized Controlled Trials, 1st ed.Edited by KyungMann Kim, Frank Bretz, Ying Kuen K. Cheung, Lisa V. Hampson, New York: Chapman & Hall, 2023, 654 pp., £47.99 (paperback), ISBN 9781032009100

Handbook of Statistical Methods for Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials

The cornerstones of randomized clinical trials

BASIC: A Bayesian Adaptive Synthetic-Control Design for Phase II Clinical Trials.

Choosing and evaluating randomisation methods in clinical trials: a qualitative study

Common Statistical Methods for Clinical Research with SAS Examples, Second Edition

Exploring Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials When Some of the Patients are Treated against the Randomization

Statistical methods for medical studies

Statistical Inference of Adaptive Randomized Clinical Trials for Personalized Medicine

Randomized clinical trial: gold standard of experimental designs - importance, advantages, disadvantages and prejudices

A novel statistical method for comparing effectiveness of two treatments-simulated randomized controlled trials

Randomized Controlled Trial Based on Big Data

Covariate adjustment for two-sample treatment comparisons in randomized clinical trials: a principled yet flexible approach

Statistical considerations for outcomes in clinical research: A review of common data types and methodology

Adaptive Clinical Trials: Exploiting Sequential Patient Recruitment and Allocation

Review of current controversial issues in clinical trials

Point estimation for adaptive trial designs I: a methodological review

The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials

Mathematical programming tools for randomization purposes in small two-arm clinical trials: A case study with real data

Statistical Techniques to Assess Publication Integrity in Groups of Randomised Trials: A Narrative Review

A Tutorial on Modern Bayesian Methods in Clinical Trials