Real-world comparison of dual versus single antiplatelet treatment in patients with non-cardioembolic mild-to-moderate ischemic stroke: A propensity matched analysis

Matteo Foschi,Raffaele Ornello,Lucio D’Anna,Eleonora De Matteis,Federico De Santis,Valentina Barone,Marilina Viola,Maria Giulia Mosconi,Diletta Rosin,Michele Romoli,Tiziana Tassinari,Silvia Cenciarelli,Bruno Censori,Marialuisa Zedde,Marina Diomedi,Marco Petruzzellis,Vincenzo Inchingolo,Manuel Cappellari,Paolo Candelaresi,Alessandra Bavaro,Anna Cavallini,Maria Grazia Piscaglia,Valeria Terruso,Alessandro Pezzini,Giovanni Frisullo,Francesco Muscia,Andrea Zini,Ruggiero Leone,Carmela Palmieri,Letizia Maria Cupini,Michela Marcon,Rossana Tassi,Enzo Sanzaro,Giulio Papiri,Giovanna Viticchi,Daniele Orsucci,Anne Falcou,Susanna Diamanti,Roberto Tarletti,Patrizia Nencini,Eugenia Rota,Federica Nicoletta Sepe,Luigi Caputi,Gino Volpi,Salvatore La Spada,Mario Beccia,Vincenzo Mastrangelo,Paolo Invernizzi,Giuseppe Pelliccioni,Maria Vittoria De Angelis,Laura Bonanni,Giampietro Ruzza,Emanuele Alessandro Caggia,Monia Russo,Agnese Tonon,Maria Cristina Acciarri,Sabrina Anticoli,Cinzia Roberti,Gaspare Scaglione,Francesca Pistoia,Chiara Alessi,Antonella De Boni,Alessandra Sanna,Alberto Chiti,Leonardo Barbarini,Maela Masato,Massimo Del Sette,Francesco Passarelli,Maria Roberta Bongioanni,Manuela De Michele,Stefano Ricci,Mariarosaria Valente,Gian Luigi Gigli,Giovanni Merlino,Maurizio Paciaroni,Maria Guarino,Simona Sacco
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241302991
2024-12-18
International Journal of Stroke
Abstract:International Journal of Stroke, Ahead of Print. Background:Short-term dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) is superior to single antiplatelet treatment (SAPT) for secondary prevention in non-cardioembolic minor ischemic stroke and high-risk transient ischemic attack (TIA). As the real-world use of DAPT is broader than in trials, it is important to clarify its benefit/risk profile in a diverse population.Methods:Post hoc analysis of prospectively collected data from the READAPT cohort and three prospective stroke registries including patients with mild-to-moderate (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score 0–10) ischemic stroke receiving early DAPT or SAPT. The primary effectiveness outcome was 90-day return to pre-stroke neurological functioning using modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Secondary effectiveness outcomes were 90-day mRS shift, new ischemic stroke/TIA, vascular and all-cause death, 24 h early neurological improvement or deterioration. The safety outcome was 90-day intracranial hemorrhage.Results:We matched 1008 patients treated with DAPT and 1008 treated with SAPT. Compared to SAPT, patients treated with DAPT showed higher likelihood of 90-day primary effectiveness outcome (87.5% vs. 84.4%, risk difference 3.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1%–6.1%); p = 0.047, risk ratio 1.03 (95% CI: 1.01–1.07); p = 0.043) and higher rate of 24-h early neurological improvement (25.3% vs. 15.4%, risk difference 9.9% (95% CI: 6.4%–13.4%); p < 0.001, risk ratio 1.65 (95% CI: 1.37–1.97); p < 0.001). No differences were observed for other study outcomes. Subgroup analysis confirmed benefit of DAPT over SAPT for primary effectiveness outcome in patients with moderate stroke, those treated with intravenous thrombolysis, and those who received antiplatelet loading dose.Conclusion:Our findings suggest that DAPT use might be safe and more effective than SAPT even in the real world and in patients who do not strictly fulfill the criteria of landmark large clinical trials.
peripheral vascular disease,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?