Do Extended Reality Interventions Benefit Patients Undergoing Elective Cardiac Surgical and Interventional Procedures? A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis

Emma Harris,Steven Fenton,John Stephenson,Fiona Ewart,Salime Goharinezhad,Hyunkook Lee,Felicity Astin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17578
2024-12-14
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Abstract:Background Extended reality (XR) interventions have the potential to benefit patients undergoing elective cardiac surgical and interventional procedures. However, there are no systematic reviews with meta‐analyses to guide clinical care. Aim To critically evaluate the evidence on the effectiveness of XR interventions on patient anxiety and pain and other associated outcomes. Design Systematic review and meta‐analysis following the PRISMA 2020 statement. Data Sources A systematic search of five databases (CENTRAL, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Scopus) from inception to July 2023. Methods Screening and data extraction was conducted independently by multiple reviewers. Stata (Version 17) was used to conduct meta‐analyses for patient anxiety and pain. Secondary patient outcomes were summarised in a synthesis. The Cochrane Risk of Bias (Version 2) tool was applied to trials and the NHLBI Study Quality Assessment tools to all other study designs. Results Of the 3372 records identified, 22 were included, 10 of which were eligible for inclusion in the meta‐analyses. Fifty‐seven percent of randomised trials were rated as high risk of bias. Virtual reality (VR) was the only XR technology evaluated. VR significantly reduced pre‐procedural anxiety (standardised mean difference: −1.29; 95% confidence interval − 1.96, −0.62, p
nursing
What problem does this paper attempt to address?