Intercluster charge ordering in monoclinic and triclinic Ba–Mo-based hollandite phases

Eslam M. Elbakry,Jared M. Allred
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4qm00622d
IF: 8.6834
2024-11-08
Materials Chemistry Frontiers
Abstract:Reproducible solid-state synthesis methods are presented for the preparation of tetragonal Ba 1.1 Mo 8 O 16 , monoclinic Na 0.325(5) Ba 1.006(18) Mo 8 O 16 , and triclinic Ba 1.12(3) Mo 8 O 16 hollandite phases, with complete, high-resolution crystal structures of the monoclinic and triclinic phases reported for the first time. The similar synthetic conditions allow direct comparisons between phases; differences between structures are shown to be correlated to subtle changes in the metal–metal bonding of the Mo 4 cluster motif that is unique to the Mo-based hollandites. The trends in the local Mo valence, stoichiometry, and key Mo–Mo bond lengths of these and other reported Mo-based hollandite phases together support an interchain charge ordering model for this family of compounds, which has been previously suggested for the case of K 2 Mo 8 O 16 . An alternate model, where Mott physics dominate the electronic structure near the Fermi level, is not supported by temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility measurements, which are reported down to 2 K. The incorporation and homogeneity of Na in the monoclinic phase is verified using atom probe tomography.
materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?