Taxane combined with lobaplatin or anthracycline for neoadjuvant chemotherapy of triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized, controlled, phase II study

Cheng Wang,Long Yuan,Xiujuan Wu,Yan Wang,Hao Tian,Guozhi Zhang,Andi Wan,Siyi Xiong,Chengfang Wang,Yuqin Zhou,Dandan Ma,Yangqiu Bao,Man Qu,Jun Jiang,Yi Zhang,Xiaowei Qi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03474-0
IF: 9.3
2024-06-20
BMC Medicine
Abstract:Previous studies have shown that the addition of platinum to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) improved outcomes for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, no studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of the combination of taxane and lobaplatin. In this study, we conducted a randomized controlled phase II clinical study to compare the efficacy and safety of taxane combined with lobaplatin or anthracycline.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper attempts to address the issue of evaluating the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel combined with lobaplatin versus paclitaxel combined with anthracyclines in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Specifically, the study aims to compare the pathological complete response rate (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and safety of these two chemotherapy regimens, in order to provide more effective treatment strategies for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC. ### Background - **Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)**: Accounts for approximately 15-20% of all breast cancer cases, with a poor prognosis. About 16% of patients experience local or distant recurrence within 5 years, with a median overall survival of only 13.5 months. - **Platinum-based Drugs**: In recent years, platinum-based drugs such as cisplatin, carboplatin, and lobaplatin have been widely used in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for TNBC, improving pCR rates, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). - **Lobaplatin**: A third-generation platinum-based anticancer drug approved in China for the treatment of advanced breast cancer, small cell lung cancer, and chronic myeloid leukemia. Previous studies have shown that lobaplatin combined with paclitaxel and anthracyclines can significantly improve overall pathological and objective response rates and DFS. - **Anthracyclines**: Although effective in breast cancer chemotherapy, they are associated with cardiotoxicity and long-term side effects such as heart failure and decline in verbal memory. ### Study Objectives - **Primary Endpoint**: Pathological complete response rate (pCR). - **Secondary Endpoints**: Event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. ### Methods - **Study Design**: This is an open-label, single-center, randomized controlled phase II clinical trial. - **Groups**: - **Arm A**: Received 6 cycles of paclitaxel combined with lobaplatin (TL). - **Arm B**: Received 6 cycles of paclitaxel combined with anthracyclines and cyclophosphamide (TEC) or 8 cycles of anthracyclines combined with cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (EC-T). - **Sample Size**: Based on previous literature, the expected pCR rate for the control group is 21%, and for the intervention group is 46%. With α = 0.05 and 1-β = 0.80, each group needs 50 patients. Considering a 20% dropout rate, each group ultimately needs 60 patients. ### Results - **pCR Rate**: The pCR rate in Arm A was 41.2%, significantly higher than the 21.2% in Arm B (P = 0.028). - **Subgroup Analysis**: Patients with positive lymph nodes and a low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) benefited more from Arm A. - **Survival Analysis**: There was no significant difference in EFS and OS between the two groups, but the EFS and OS in the pCR group were significantly better than in the non-pCR group. - **Toxicity**: The incidence of grade 3/4 anemia was higher in Arm A, while the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was higher in Arm B. ### Conclusion - **Main Conclusion**: The efficacy of paclitaxel combined with lobaplatin in neoadjuvant chemotherapy is superior to that of paclitaxel combined with anthracyclines, and the toxicity profiles of the two regimens are similar. - **Future Outlook**: The results of this study provide a reference for combination strategies involving immunotherapy in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for TNBC. ### Limitations - **Single-Center Study**: Potential data bias. - **Small Sample Size**: Long-term results need further validation. - **Exclusion of Immunotherapy**: Immunotherapy was not included as the study was initiated before the publication of KEYNOTE-522. Through this study, the authors hope to provide more effective treatment strategies for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in TNBC and offer a reference for further research.