On the crossing number of K_13

Dan McQuillan,Shengjun Pan,R. Bruce Richter
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1307.3297
2013-07-12
Combinatorics
Abstract:Since the crossing number of K_{12} is now known to be 150, it is well-known that simple counting arguments and Kleitman's parity theorem for the crossing number of K_{2n+1} combine with a specific drawing of K_{13} to show that the crossing number of K_{13} is one of the numbers in {217,219,221,223,225}. We show that the crossing number is not 217.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?