Abstract:Health professionals from every corner of the health sector—from allergy to vascular surgery, from epidemiology to environmental health, from nursing to hospital administration—have recognized the magnitude and urgency of the climate crisis. A growing literature provides guidance on how to conceptualize and meet the vast challenges we face and on how to keep our spirits up as we do so. Sorensen et al 1 propose roles and responsibilities for health professionals in the context of the climate crisis. They outline a far-reaching job description—from primary prevention to disaster preparedness and response to attribution science, from clinical care to patient education to policy advocacy. They point out that neither our current professional training nor the configuration of our health sector is fit for purpose: the climate crisis calls for substantial enhancement of health curricula and for systemic change across the health sector and beyond. Several aspects of the article by Sorensen et al 1 are noteworthy. First, they apply the traditional prevention hierarchy to the climate crisis. In this model, primary prevention consists of efforts to prevent the onset of disease, such as through immunization or smoking cessation; secondary prevention consists of early detection of disease such as through Papanicolaou tests, followed by interventions to improve outcomes; and tertiary prevention involves treatment or rehabilitation of people already affected, such as diabetes management or stroke rehabilitation. 2 However, these categories are grounded in clinical thinking; they do not always lead us upstream, to consider what have been called the causes of the causes . 3 Climate change, as the ultimate system problem, demands upstream thinking, far upstream of the health sector. Accordingly, as Sorensen et al 1 point out, primary prevention in this context means tackling the root causes of climate change: reducing carbon emissions, reversing destructive land use changes, and promoting carbon drawdown. In the parlance of climate action, this is mitigation (ie, avoiding the unmanageable). Since climate change is already amplifying such outcomes as malaria and malnutrition, measures that would conventionally be considered primary prevention (eg, mosquito eradication programs and nutritional supplements) are best viewed as secondary prevention, or in the parlance of climate action, adaptation (ie, managing the unavoidable). Finally, tertiary prevention in the climate context consists of efforts to reduce suffering among those already affected by climate change, including care for climate refugees displaced from their homes, those affected by weather disasters, and those with climate anxiety. These tertiary prevention actions correspond to disaster response. This reframing of prevention categories with the shift from clinical care to climate action is not just an academic exercise. It has real implications. Few physicians are transportation planners, few nurses are agronomists, and few public health professionals are electrical engineers, but the pathways to preventing climate-related suffering run directly through low-carbon transport, regenerative agriculture, and renewable energy. As Sorensen et al 1 point out, a transdisciplinary approach is necessary, because climate change is so far reaching in its causes and effects. Health professionals need not become experts in these domains, but they need to understand them well enough to help integrate health into the work of other sectors, to endorse them as health strategies, and to advocate for them. A second key point Sorensen et al 1 make is the need for coordination between clinical care and public health. The disconnect between these domains has long been recognized and was highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic. 4 For example, clinical insights and clinical data need to flow into public health surveillance systems, which need to transform the data into actionable information, which needs to flow back to clinicians (and to the public and policymakers). However, the integration of clinical care and public health is only a beginning. We also need collaboration between the health sector and other sectors, including meteorology, which provides invaluable climate models and weather forecasts; emergency management, which responds to climate disasters; parks and recreation, which manages nature-based solutions in cities; and agriculture, which produces food in the context of changing climate constraints. Should required premedicine courses include not only biology and chemistry, but also earth sciences and ecology? Should medical students rotate not only through pediatrics and surgery wards, but also through transportation and emergency management agencies? A third major aspect of the article by Sorensen et al 1 is implici -Abstract Truncated-

Time to treat the climate and nature crisis as one indivisible global health emergency

Learning to treat the climate emergency together: social tipping interventions by the health community

Dermatology's call to emergency action on climate change

From Concept to Action: a United, Holistic and One Health Approach to Respond to the Climate Change Crisis.

Are we ignoring a black elephant in the Anthropocene? Climate change and global pandemic as the crisis in health and equality

How Physicians Should Respond to Climate Change

Views on climate change and health

Health psychology and climate change: time to address humanity's most existential crisis

After millions of preventable deaths, climate change must be treated like a health emergency

Triple planetary crisis: why healthcare professionals should care

The climate crisis – actions to prioritize for anaesthesiologists

The 2020 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: responding to converging crises

Global Climate Emergency: after COP24, climate science, urgency, and the threat to humanity

Climate change and health: three grand challenges

Climate change and One Health

Environmental and health crises: the need for a new perspective on time

Interconnecting global threats: climate change, biodiversity loss, and infectious diseases

Climate change and global health: A call to more research and more action

Bringing health out of the clinic and into the courts

Health Professionals and the Climate Crisis

Climate change and COVID-19: shared challenges, divergent perspectives, and proposed collaborative solutions