Abstract:In this paper we consider the problem of multiple testing when the hypotheses are dependent. In most of the existing literature, either Bayesian or non-Bayesian, the decision rules mainly focus on the validity of the test procedure rather than actually utilizing the dependency to increase efficiency. Moreover, the decisions regarding different hypotheses are marginal in the sense that they do not depend upon each other directly. However, in realistic situations, the hypotheses are usually dependent, and hence it is desirable that the decisions regarding the dependent hypotheses are taken jointly. In this article we develop a novel Bayesian multiple testing procedure that coherently takes this requirement into consideration. Our method, which is based on new notions of error and non-error terms, substantially enhances efficiency by judicious exploitation of the dependence structure among the hypotheses. We prove that our method minimizes the posterior expected loss associated with a an additive "0-1" loss function, we also prove theoretical results on the relevant error probabilities, establishing the coherence and usefulness of our method. The optimal decision configuration is not available in closed form and we propose a novel and efficient simulated annealing algorithm for the purpose of optimization, which is also generically applicable to binary optimization problems. Numerical studies demonstrate that in dependent situations, our method performs significantly better than some existing popular conventional multiple testing methods, in terms of accuracy and power control. Moreover, application of our ideas to a real, spatial data set associated with radionuclide concentration in Rongelap islands yielded insightful results.

Dealing with multiple testing: To adjust or not to adjust

A note on extending Scheffé's modified multiple-comparison procedure to other analysis situations

A model of multiple hypothesis testing

A New Multiple Testing Method in the Dependent Case

A Practitioner's Guide to Multiple Testing Error Rates

MultipleTesting.com: a tool for life science researchers for multiple hypothesis testing correction

Adjusted inference for multiple testing procedure in group sequential designs

Addressing researcher degrees of freedom through minP adjustment

Comparisons of methods for multiple hypothesis testing in neuropsychological research.

Multiple testing when many $p$-values are uniformly conservative, with application to testing qualitative interaction in educational interventions

Multiple testing in statistical analysis of systems-based information retrieval experiments

A Family of Bayes Multiple Testing Procedures

Robustness of multiple testing procedures against dependence

Two-Stage Testing in a high dimensional setting

Non-marginal Decisions: A Novel Bayesian Multiple Testing Procedure

Testing hypotheses on a tree: new error rates and controlling strategies

More Powerful Multiple Testing in Randomized Experiments with Non-Compliance

A multiple testing correction method for genetic association studies using correlated single nucleotide polymorphisms

Matching with Multiple Control Groups with Adjustment for Group Differences

Testing Hypotheses When You Have More Than a Few

Multiple testing with the structure adaptive Benjamini-Hochberg algorithm