Abstract:PurposeThe use of life cycle assessment (LCA) as a decision support tool can be hampered by the numerous uncertainties embedded in the calculation. The treatment of uncertainty is necessary to increase the reliability and credibility of LCA results. The objective is to provide an overview of the methods to identify, characterize, propagate (uncertainty analysis), understand the effects (sensitivity analysis), and communicate uncertainty in order to propose recommendations to a broad public of LCA practitioners.MethodsThis work was carried out via a literature review and an analysis of LCA tool functionalities. In order to facilitate the identification of uncertainty, its location within an LCA model was distinguished between quantity (any numerical data), model structure (relationships structure), and context (criteria chosen within the goal and scope of the study). The methods for uncertainty characterization, uncertainty analysis, and sensitivity analysis were classified according to the information provided, their implementation in LCA software, the time and effort required to apply them, and their reliability and validity. This review led to the definition of recommendations on three levels: basic (low efforts with LCA software), intermediate (significant efforts with LCA software), and advanced (significant efforts with non-LCA software).Results and discussionFor the basic recommendations, minimum and maximum values (quantity uncertainty) and alternative scenarios (model structure/context uncertainty) are defined for critical elements in order to estimate the range of results. Result sensitivity is analyzed via one-at-a-time variations (with realistic ranges of quantities) and scenario analyses. Uncertainty should be discussed at least qualitatively in a dedicated paragraph. For the intermediate level, the characterization can be refined with probability distributions and an expert review for scenario definition. Uncertainty analysis can then be performed with the Monte Carlo method for the different scenarios. Quantitative information should appear in inventory tables and result figures. Finally, advanced practitioners can screen uncertainty sources more exhaustively, include correlations, estimate model error with validation data, and perform Latin hypercube sampling and global sensitivity analysis.ConclusionsThrough this pedagogic review of the methods and practical recommendations, the authors aim to increase the knowledge of LCA practitioners related to uncertainty and facilitate the application of treatment techniques. To continue in this direction, further research questions should be investigated (e.g., on the implementation of fuzzy logic and model uncertainty characterization) and the developers of databases, LCIA methods, and software tools should invest efforts in better implementing and treating uncertainty in LCA.

Assessment, quantification and propagation of uncertainty in seismic life-cycle cost analysis

Probabilistic Assessment of Seismic Stability of a Rock Slope by Combining the Simulation of Stochastic Ground Motion with Permanent Displacement Analysis

Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis of seismic fragility curves using kriging

Assessing uncertainty in building material emissions using scenario-aware Monte Carlo Simulation

LANDSLIDE TSUNAMI HAZARD ASSESSMENT: A NUMERICAL MODEL FOR THE SIMULATION OF MULTIPLE LANDSLIDE-INDUCED TSUNAMIS SCENARIOS IN A MONTE CARLO FRAMEWORK

Probabilistic seismic demand assessment accounting for finite element model class uncertainty: Application to a code‐designed URM infilled reinforced concrete frame building

Fragility Based Life Cycle Loss Estimation Methodology for Critical Facilities

A framework for rapid seismic performance and fragility analysis of earth slopes considering uncertainties

Handling Uncertainty in Models of Seismic and Postseismic Hazards: Toward Robust Methods and Resilient Societies

Seismic risk assessments for real estate portfolios: Impact of engineering investigation on quality of seismic risk studies

Uncertainty quantification of spatially uncorrelated loads with a reduced-order stochastic isogeometric method

Assessment of various seismic fragility analysis approaches for structures excited by non-stationary stochastic ground motions

Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Through Explicit Consideration of Uncertainties in Structural Capacities and Structural Demands

Uncertainty qualification in seismic analysis of concrete dams based on model order reduction accelerated stochastic SBFEM

Seismic fragility analysis using stochastic polynomial chaos expansions

How to treat uncertainties in life cycle assessment studies?

Life Cycle Assessment under Uncertainty: A Scoping Review

A Kriging-Based Uncertainty Quantification for Fracture Assessment

Classification of sources of uncertainties in building LCA

Efficient computational system reliability analysis of reinforced soil-retaining structures under seismic conditions including the effect of simulated noise

Accounting for ground-motion uncertainty in empirical seismic fragility modeling